Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Better errors for sample_weight and priors #1017

Closed
wants to merge 2 commits into from

Conversation

AKuederle
Copy link
Contributor

changed control flow so that errors caused by sample_weights or prios will be raised and will not result into falling back to the next input shape case.

At the moment, if you pass data as a 3D tensor (case 1), but either the priors or the sample_weight would be invalid, you will not get the error caused by these parameters, but rather will get an "obscure" error related the the shape of X itself, as the code falls back to assuming the input is a list of 2D arrays (which it is not).

This PR changes the control flow to "select" the input type case only based on errors raised during validation of X itself, but will correctly raise all errors caused by the validation of sample_weight or priors

…s will be raised and will not result into falling back to the next input shape case
@jmschrei jmschrei closed this Apr 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants