Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

The common atttribute of PerformanceEntry should be initialized rat… #210

Merged
merged 4 commits into from
Feb 2, 2024

Conversation

noamr
Copy link
Contributor

@noamr noamr commented Jan 22, 2024

…her than inherited

Other specs should initialize startTime/entry/name/endTime rather than provide overrides for them.


💥 Error: 502 Bad Gateway 💥

PR Preview failed to build. (Last tried on Feb 2, 2024, 2:45 PM UTC).

More

PR Preview relies on a number of web services to run. There seems to be an issue with the following one:

🚨 Spec Generator - Spec Generator is the web service used to build specs that rely on ReSpec.

🔗 Related URL

error code: 502

If you don't have enough information above to solve the error by yourself (or to understand to which web service the error is related to, if any), please file an issue.

…her than inherited

Other specs should initialize startTime/entry/name/endTime
rather than provide overrides for them.
@noamr noamr requested a review from clelland January 22, 2024 08:26
index.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
index.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
index.html Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@noamr
Copy link
Contributor Author

noamr commented Feb 1, 2024

@clelland care to review?

index.html Outdated

<ol>
<li>Assert: <var>entryType</var> is defined in the <a href="https://w3c.github.io/timing-entrytypes-registry/#registry">entry type registry</a>.
<li>Set <var>entry</var>'s <a>startTime</a> to <var>startTime</var>.
Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Done

Copy link
Contributor

@clelland clelland left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Oops, accidentally deleted that comment; didn't realize it had already been sent. The general idea I wanted to suggest was that we may want to make a general distinction in specs between a one-time 'initialization" vs a maybe-repeatable "set" operation. I don't know if this happens anywhere else, aside from the "initial values" we give to some properties.

Anyway, this LGTM, thanks!

@noamr noamr merged commit d97e6e3 into gh-pages Feb 2, 2024
2 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants