chore(deps-dev): bump pytest-asyncio from 0.16.0 to 0.21.1

[dependabot]

Bumps pytest-asyncio from 0.16.0 to 0.21.1.

Release notes

Sourced from pytest-asyncio's releases.

pytest-asyncio 0.21.1

0.21.1 (2023-07-12)

• Output a proper error message when an invalid asyncio_mode is selected.
• Extend warning message about unclosed event loops with additional possible cause. #531
• Previously, some tests reported "skipped" or "xfailed" as a result. Now all tests report a "success" result.

pytest-asyncio 0.21.0

0.21.0 (23-03-19)

• Drop compatibility with pytest 6.1. Pytest-asyncio now depends on pytest 7.0 or newer.
• pytest-asyncio cleans up any stale event loops when setting up and tearing down the event_loop fixture. This behavior has been deprecated and pytest-asyncio emits a DeprecationWarning when tearing down the event_loop fixture and current event loop has not been closed.

pytest-asyncio 0.20.3

---

title: 'pytest-asyncio'

pytest-asyncio is a pytest plugin. It facilitates testing of code that uses the asyncio library.

Specifically, pytest-asyncio provides support for coroutines as test functions. This allows users to await code inside their tests. For example, the following code is executed as a test item by pytest:

@pytest.mark.asyncio
async def test_some_asyncio_code():
    res = await library.do_something()
    assert b"expected result" == res

Note that test classes subclassing the standard unittest library are not supported. Users are advised to use unittest.IsolatedAsyncioTestCase

... (truncated)

Commits

• a10cbde [docs] Fixed typo.
• 82b010d [docs] Add release date of v0.21.1 to changelog.
• af08b1c [test] Removed obsolete test "test_async_close_loop".
• 79b2d1a [test] Added a test case which verifies compatibility with pytest.skip in aut...
• 39a9754 [test] The test that asserts compatibility with pytest.mark.skip reports succ...
• a26b6dd [test] Added a test case which verifies compatibility with pytest.mark.xfail ...
• 7fa36f2 [test] The test that asserts compatibility with pytest.mark.xfail reports suc...
• df88119 [docs] Improved readbility of headings on the fixtures reference in the docs.
• 75a1a6c [feat] Extend warning message about unclosed event loops with additional poss...
• 1821542 [docs] Explain that scopes of event_loop fixtures should not overlap.
• Additional commits viewable in compare view

Dependabot will resolve any conflicts with this PR as long as you don't alter it yourself. You can also trigger a rebase manually by commenting @dependabot rebase.

---

Dependabot commands and options

You can trigger Dependabot actions by commenting on this PR:

• @dependabot rebase will rebase this PR
• @dependabot recreate will recreate this PR, overwriting any edits that have been made to it
• @dependabot merge will merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot squash and merge will squash and merge this PR after your CI passes on it
• @dependabot cancel merge will cancel a previously requested merge and block automerging
• @dependabot reopen will reopen this PR if it is closed
• @dependabot close will close this PR and stop Dependabot recreating it. You can achieve the same result by closing it manually
• @dependabot ignore this major version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this major version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this minor version will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this minor version (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)
• @dependabot ignore this dependency will close this PR and stop Dependabot creating any more for this dependency (unless you reopen the PR or upgrade to it yourself)

[dependabot]

Dependabot tried to add @abusi as a reviewer to this PR, but received the following error from GitHub:

POST https://api.github.com/repos/tartiflette/tartiflette/pulls/633/requested_reviewers: 422 - Reviews may only be requested from collaborators. One or more of the users or teams you specified is not a collaborator of the tartiflette/tartiflette repository. // See: https://docs.github.com/rest/pulls/review-requests#request-reviewers-for-a-pull-request