-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 5.1k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
DOC: array types: mention partial support in special
#19677
Conversation
[skip ci]
[docs only]
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I don't have strong views on whether "Array" should be capitalized or not, but I agree with Matt that this is a net improvement, thanks.
I squash-merged for backporting sanity |
Oops; was waiting for CI to finish and got distracted. In the future, feel free to me for merge @lucascolley! |
* mention partial support in `special` * address review comments * make capitalisation consistent
* mention partial support in `special` * address review comments * make capitalisation consistent
Reference issue
Towards gh-19252
What does this implement/fix?
Document the partial support for the array API towards gh-18867 which is being released as part of SciPy 1.12.
Additional information
Should be backported to the 1.12 branch.
We could add extra information about how there is special casing to call out to PyTorch and CuPy despite compiled code underlying the SciPy implementations and an
xp.special
extension not being a thing (yet), but this might not be necessary.