Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Fix inplace lshift usage #126387

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Conversation

DominikaJedynak
Copy link

It seems that there is a typo: for the rhift op we distinguish between inplace and regular implementation but for the lshift we call lshift in both situations.

Copy link

pytorch-bot bot commented May 16, 2024

🔗 Helpful Links

🧪 See artifacts and rendered test results at hud.pytorch.org/pr/126387

Note: Links to docs will display an error until the docs builds have been completed.

✅ No Failures

As of commit 67fba28 with merge base d61a81a (image):
💚 Looks good so far! There are no failures yet. 💚

This comment was automatically generated by Dr. CI and updates every 15 minutes.

@pytorch-bot pytorch-bot bot added the release notes: jit release notes category label May 16, 2024
Copy link

linux-foundation-easycla bot commented May 16, 2024

CLA Signed

The committers listed above are authorized under a signed CLA.

@Skylion007
Copy link
Collaborator

Also sign the CLA

Co-authored-by: Aaron Gokaslan <aaronGokaslan@gmail.com>
@Skylion007
Copy link
Collaborator

@DominikaJedynak you need to sign the CLA for this to get merged.

@drisspg drisspg added the triaged This issue has been looked at a team member, and triaged and prioritized into an appropriate module label May 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
open source release notes: jit release notes category triaged This issue has been looked at a team member, and triaged and prioritized into an appropriate module
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants