Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[xml] Airframe updates after testflights #3218

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Dec 19, 2023

Conversation

dewagter
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

@@ -27,6 +33,32 @@
<waypoint lat="52.164861" lon="4.427268" name="C7"/>
<waypoint lat="52.170422" lon="4.427511" name="C8"/>
<waypoint lat="52.172276" lon="4.424011" name="C9"/>
<!-- t'Harde
<waypoint lat="52.4034734" lon="5.9067552" name="C1"/>

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It seems that you have to deal with multiple flight zones. Instead of commenting the waypoints in every flight plans, I recommend you to use includes like this:
https://github.com/paparazzi/paparazzi/blob/master/conf/flight_plans/competitions/IMAV2023_data.xml
https://github.com/paparazzi/paparazzi/blob/master/conf/flight_plans/competitions/IMAV2023_carto.xml#L105

Copy link
Member Author

@dewagter dewagter Dec 18, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Option 1: local FP includes common list of blocks:

Option 2: common main flightplan including a list of local WP

  • problem: can not change the alt="60" ground_alt="0" lat0="52.965523" lon0="4.474033"

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Procedures are indeed limited in terms of parsing, but you can at least easily use definition of (global) waypoints and sectors.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This only seems to work when the WP are close to the FP HOME.

Any fundamental reason why included Flight plans are parsed differently?

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not sure what you mean by close to HOME. Is it for local waypoints or global ones (or both ?)

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I mean the flightplan location: <flight_plan alt="70" ground_alt="0" lat0="52.1681551" lon0="4.4126468" is the most important difference.

@dewagter dewagter added this to the v6.4 milestone Dec 18, 2023
@dewagter dewagter force-pushed the rotwing_airframe_update_testflights branch from 6ed0ca1 to 5616124 Compare December 18, 2023 21:31
@dewagter
Copy link
Member Author

Flight plan cleaned. Ready to merge.

@gautierhattenberger gautierhattenberger merged commit 1ea818d into master Dec 19, 2023
1 check passed
@gautierhattenberger gautierhattenberger deleted the rotwing_airframe_update_testflights branch December 19, 2023 07:54
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants