Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

second approach to fix setitem parametrizations #57629

Closed
wants to merge 8 commits into from

Conversation

lopof
Copy link
Contributor

@lopof lopof commented Feb 26, 2024

@lopof lopof mentioned this pull request Feb 26, 2024
4 tasks
Copy link
Contributor

github-actions bot commented Apr 7, 2024

This pull request is stale because it has been open for thirty days with no activity. Please update and respond to this comment if you're still interested in working on this.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Apr 7, 2024
@mroeschke
Copy link
Member

Thanks for the pull request, but it appears to have gone stale. If interested in continuing, please merge in the main branch, address any review comments and/or failing tests, and we can reopen.

@mroeschke mroeschke closed this May 15, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

TST: test_setitem_integer_with_missing_raises contains duplicate parametrization
2 participants