Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Added Innogy Bücherschrank, RWE Bücherschrank, Westenergie Bücherschrank #9439

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
May 24, 2024

Conversation

danieldegroot2
Copy link
Contributor

@danieldegroot2 danieldegroot2 commented May 3, 2024

Adds Innogy Bücherschrank, RWE Bücherschrank, Westenergie Bücherschrank.

Mapped:

  • Innogy Bücherschrank (2/150+) (operator/funder: municipal / city government, local inhabitants)
  • RWE Bücherschrank (11/38+) (operator/funder: municipal / city government, local inhabitants)
  • Westenergie Bücherschrank (2/355+) (operator/funder: municipal / city government, local inhabitants)

All should have a plaque.
Westenergie has at least two with municipal partner company NEW (identical). Would move any partners to description.
Innogy (and RWE) bookcases may or may not be part of Westenergie network, but signed name(/brand) remains the same.
So, I do not know if it is worth 'wrongly' adding Westenergie wikidata to 'merged' Innogy bookcase brand.

Adds RWE Bücherschrank.
Adds Westenergie Bücherschrank.
Adds Innogy Bücherschrank.
@danieldegroot2 danieldegroot2 changed the title Added RWE Bücherschrank, Westenergie Bücherschrank Added Innogy Bücherschrank, RWE Bücherschrank, Westenergie Bücherschrank May 3, 2024
@bhousel
Copy link
Member

bhousel commented May 24, 2024

I don't understand any of your comment, but thanks 👍

@bhousel bhousel merged commit b9c804e into osmlab:main May 24, 2024
2 checks passed
@danieldegroot2
Copy link
Contributor Author

There was transfer of assets between these companies. Westenergie may have 'virtually' adopted some bookcases from the Innogy brand, including them in their count on their website, but they are still physically signed as the old brand.
Anyhow, it should be fine to leave it as-is.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants