Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[1.28] DO NOT MERGE: test 1.28 with go1.22.3 #124922

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: release-1.28
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

MadhavJivrajani
Copy link
Contributor

Signed-off-by: Madhav Jivrajani <madhav.jiv@gmail.com>
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

Adding the "do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed" label because no release-note block was detected, please follow our release note process to remove it.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added this to the v1.28 milestone May 17, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved Indicates that a PR is not yet approved to merge into a release branch. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files. labels May 17, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This cherry pick PR is for a release branch and has not yet been approved by Release Managers.
Adding the do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved label.

To merge this cherry pick, it must first be approved (/lgtm + /approve) by the relevant OWNERS.

If you didn't cherry-pick this change to all supported release branches, please leave a comment describing why other cherry-picks are not needed to speed up the review process.

If you're not sure is it required to cherry-pick this change to all supported release branches, please consult the cherry-pick guidelines document.

AFTER it has been approved by code owners, please leave the following comment on a line by itself, with no leading whitespace: /cc kubernetes/release-managers

(This command will request a cherry pick review from Release Managers and should work for all GitHub users, whether they are members of the Kubernetes GitHub organization or not.)

For details on the patch release process and schedule, see the Patch Releases page.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. labels May 17, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

This issue is currently awaiting triage.

If a SIG or subproject determines this is a relevant issue, they will accept it by applying the triage/accepted label and provide further guidance.

The triage/accepted label can be added by org members by writing /triage accepted in a comment.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository.

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added the needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. label May 17, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is NOT APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: MadhavJivrajani
Once this PR has been reviewed and has the lgtm label, please assign bentheelder for approval. For more information see the Kubernetes Code Review Process.

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@MadhavJivrajani
Copy link
Contributor Author

pull-kubernetes-dependencies is expected to fail here since we aren't actually bumping the go version here.

@MadhavJivrajani MadhavJivrajani changed the title [1.28] DO NOT MERGE: test 1.27 with go1.22.3 [1.28] DO NOT MERGE: test 1.28 with go1.22.3 May 17, 2024
@k8s-ci-robot
Copy link
Contributor

@MadhavJivrajani: The following tests failed, say /retest to rerun all failed tests or /retest-required to rerun all mandatory failed tests:

Test name Commit Details Required Rerun command
pull-kubernetes-dependencies 6cb444b link true /test pull-kubernetes-dependencies
pull-kubernetes-verify 6cb444b link true /test pull-kubernetes-verify

Full PR test history. Your PR dashboard. Please help us cut down on flakes by linking to an open issue when you hit one in your PR.

Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. I understand the commands that are listed here.

@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented May 17, 2024

go version go1.22.3 linux/amd64
go: downloading go1.22.3 (linux/amd64)
go: download go1.22.3 for linux/amd64: toolchain not available

hmm... not sure why that's unhappy... or why go1.22.3 is trying to download go1.22.3...

it's also super weird this is only having an issue in this one verify test... all the other unit / integration / verify tests are fine

@liggitt
Copy link
Member

liggitt commented May 17, 2024

oh, I think it's because that one is running containerized:

+++ command: bash "hack/make-rules/../../hack/verify-codegen.sh"
go version go1.22.3 linux/amd64
+++ [0517 06:22:42] Generating protobufs for 67 targets
+++ [0517 06:22:42] protoc 23.4 not found (can install with hack/install-protoc.sh); generating containerized...
+++ [0517 06:22:42] Verifying Prerequisites....
+++ [0517 06:22:43] Building Docker image kube-build:build-71fc6bd7d6-5-v1.28.0-go1.21.10-bullseye.0
+++ [0517 06:24:57] Creating data container kube-build-data-71fc6bd7d6-5-v1.28.0-go1.21.10-bullseye.0
+++ [0517 06:24:58] Syncing sources to container
+++ [0517 06:25:03] Output from this container will be rsynced out upon completion. Set KUBE_RUN_COPY_OUTPUT=n to disable.
+++ [0517 06:25:03] Running build command...
go: downloading go1.22.3 (linux/amd64)
go: download go1.22.3 for linux/amd64: toolchain not available
!!! [0517 06:25:04] Call tree:
!!! [0517 06:25:04]  1: build/../build/common.sh:489 kube::build::run_build_command_ex(...)
!!! [0517 06:25:04]  2: build/run.sh:39 kube::build::run_build_command(...)
!!! [0517 06:25:04] Call tree:
!!! [0517 06:25:04]  1: hack/update-codegen.sh:919 codegen::protobuf(...)
+++ exit code: 1
+++ error: 1
�[0;31mFAILED�[0m   verify-codegen.sh	148s

I suspect this is an existing error related handling of GOTOOLCHAIN / .go-version inside that container that will disappear once we do the real bump with kube-build images with the go version we actually expect

Opened #124932 to track fixing in general

@MadhavJivrajani
Copy link
Contributor Author

@liggitt yep!
xref: #120279 (comment)

@BenTheElder
Copy link
Member

xref: #120279 (comment)

That sub-thread shouldn't be relevant here, we're not setting GOEXPERIMENT or using a Go X:... toolchain, and unless for some ??? reason CI is setting GOTOOLCHAIN=...(???) we're setting it to go${GO_VERSION}.

@dims
Copy link
Member

dims commented May 22, 2024

/sig testing

@k8s-ci-robot k8s-ci-robot added sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. and removed do-not-merge/needs-sig Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `sig/foo` label and requires one. labels May 22, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
cncf-cla: yes Indicates the PR's author has signed the CNCF CLA. do-not-merge/cherry-pick-not-approved Indicates that a PR is not yet approved to merge into a release branch. do-not-merge/needs-kind Indicates a PR lacks a `kind/foo` label and requires one. do-not-merge/release-note-label-needed Indicates that a PR should not merge because it's missing one of the release note labels. needs-priority Indicates a PR lacks a `priority/foo` label and requires one. needs-triage Indicates an issue or PR lacks a `triage/foo` label and requires one. sig/testing Categorizes an issue or PR as relevant to SIG Testing. size/XS Denotes a PR that changes 0-9 lines, ignoring generated files.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants