Rename some executables which have too generic names #605
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
@dimztimz Can this be merged please? |
to be placed in /usr/bin - this patch prefixes them with 'hunspell-' Real authorship is a bit unclear as Gentoo is using this kind of patch since hunspell-1.1.3 which was added to Gentoo back in 2006-01-29 and the corresponding bug report didn't mention the patch at all: https://bugs.gentoo.org/114482 https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo/historical.git/commit/app-text/hunspell?id=3db0fa8ec9766b9880201ce3775f9953b98a2468
Polynomial-C
force-pushed
the
v1.7.0-renameexes
branch
from
d3e2d1d
to
69d2f0f
Compare
|
I've updated the author of this patch to reflect the person that committed the patch to Gentoo back in 2006. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
to be placed in /usr/bin - this patch prefixes them with 'hunspell-'
Real authorship is a bit unclear as Gentoo is using this kind of patch since
hunspell-1.1.3 which was added to Gentoo back in 2006-01-29 and the
corresponding bug report didn't mention the patch at all:
https://bugs.gentoo.org/114482
https://gitweb.gentoo.org/repo/gentoo/historical.git/commit/app-text/hunspell?id=3db0fa8ec9766b9880201ce3775f9953b98a2468
Closes #596