Revert E1M5 music change; clear "Previously Featured in 0.12.1" section #1356
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
I don't know what was going through my head when I restored Ralphis' old E1M1 track even though I vehemently wanted it replaced for being an "At Doom's Gate" remix.
I don't think maintaining the "Previously Featured in x" section is a good idea now that we've reached a stable release: it's extra clutter and will be a PITA to manage.
Xindage
reviewed
May 5, 2024
|
"Previously Featured in x" can be moved to attic as it refers to older resources. However, it also makes sense to write about completely unused tracks as well. |
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Closes #1348 by proxy.
I don't know what was going through my head when I restored Ralphis' old E1M1 track even though I vehemently wanted it replaced for being an "At Doom's Gate" remix.
Maintaining the "Previously Featured in x" section isn't really a good idea now that we've reached a stable release: it's extra clutter and will be a PITA to manage what's what.