Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add prototype for Firebase Vertex AI #12357

Closed
wants to merge 54 commits into from
Closed

Add prototype for Firebase Vertex AI #12357

wants to merge 54 commits into from

Conversation

andrewheard
Copy link
Contributor

@andrewheard andrewheard commented Feb 5, 2024

Do not merge. This is a prototype that uses Vertex AI with the Google Generative AI SDK.

Usage:

import FirebaseCore
import FirebaseVertexAI
...
FirebaseApp.configure()
let model = VertexAI.vertexAI().generativeModel(modelName: "gemini-1.0-pro")
    
Task {
  let responses = model.generateContentStream("Why is the sky blue?")
  for try await response in responses {
    if let text = response.text {
      print(text)
    } else {
      print("No text in candidate.")
    }
  }
}

#no-changelog

Copy link
Contributor

@peterfriese peterfriese left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Just a few minor remarks.

I love that most of the code for the samples can stay the same!

FirebaseVertexAI/Sample/ChatSample/ChatSampleApp.swift Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
SafetyRatingsSection(ratings: ratings)
}

case GenerateContentError.invalidAPIKey:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

This might no longer be applicable, and the message we issue in line 155 might mislead people.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Good call. I updated the message to refer to the GoogleService-Info.plist instead since an invalidAPIKey error in this SDK would be because of Firebase mis-configuration (or revocation of the Firebase app's API key).

I would probably leave this error case out entirely if the prototype weren't built on top of the existing generative-ai-swift SDK.

)
}

case GenerateContentError.unsupportedUserLocation:
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I wonder if this is still going to be an issue. Even when providing europe-west1, the model happily answers.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I removed this case from the switch statement since it'll never be thrown with Vertex AI. Gemini is available on Vertex AI in these Cloud regions but can be called from anywhere (e.g., I could specify europe-west1 but latency from North America will be higher).

/// This instance is configured with the default `FirebaseApp`.
public static func generativeModel(modelName: String, location: String) -> GoogleGenerativeAI
.GenerativeModel {
return generativeModel(app: FirebaseApp.app()!, modelName: modelName, location: location)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Force unwrap makes me feel uneasy...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added a fatalError instead of a force-unwrap. The following error message will also be logged in this scenario:

FIRLogError(kFIRLoggerCore, @"I-COR000003",
@"The default Firebase app has not yet been "
@"configured. Add `FirebaseApp.configure()` to your "
@"application initialization. This can be done in "
@"in the App Delegate's application(_:didFinishLaunchingWithOptions:)` "
@"(or the `@main` struct's initializer in SwiftUI). "
@"Read more: https://goo.gl/ctyzm8.");
return nil;

modelResouceName = modelResourceName
}

private static func modelResourceName(app: FirebaseApp, modelName: String,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Shouldn't this rather be modelResourcePath? In line 93, we return a path (or at least a path fragment).

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I chose this function name because it's a model resource name in resource-oriented design (see https://google.aip.dev/122).

Note: The field in the REST API is called model instead of name.

)
return GenerativeModel(
name: modelResouceName,
apiKey: app.options.apiKey!,
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Force unwrap makes me feel uneasy...

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Added a fatalError instead of the force unwrap.

return modelName
}
guard let projectID = app.options.projectID else {
print("The FirebaseApp is missing a project ID.")
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In case of a misconfiguration like a missing project ID, shouldn't we at least issue a warning on the log?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I changed this to a fatalError as well. If projectID is nil then something is wrong with the Firebase app configuration.

return modelName
}

return "projects/\(projectID)/locations/\(location)/publishers/google/models/\(modelName)"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There doesn't seem to be a check for the location.

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Since location isn't an optional parameter I added a check for "". Beyond that I'll leave it up to the backend to return a 404 error if an invalid location is specified.

FirebaseVertexAI/Sources/VertexAI.swift Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved

// MARK: Request Hooks

/// Adds an App Check token to the provided request, if App Check is included in the app.
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Remove the comma before if

Adds an App Check token to the provided request if App Check is included in the app.

Also, do we add the token even if App Check is just included in the app? Or does it have to be enabled for us to send the token?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It's good to send the App Check token, if it's included in the app, even if it's not enabled for the Firebase project / app. If it's not enabled at all then it'll just be ignored by the backend. If App Check is enabled but unenforced then developers will be able to see how many requests would be blocked if/when they enforce App Check.

andrewheard and others added 25 commits April 2, 2024 09:13
This reverts commit af7d783.

# Conflicts:
#	FirebaseVertexAI/Sources/VertexAI.swift
#	Package.swift
paulb777 and others added 22 commits April 2, 2024 13:52
Co-authored-by: Paul Beusterien <paulbeusterien@google.com>
@paulb777
Copy link
Member

Closing. VertexAI support is now in main

@paulb777 paulb777 closed this May 20, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

5 participants