refactor: flatten

[ariskemper]

No description provided.

[fabian-hiller]

Thanks for improving the code. I think I don't like to split small functions into even smaller ones when it's not necessary. It increases the bundle size and makes the code more complex in my eyes.

[ariskemper]

@fabian-hiller actually it has better readability and not so different bundle size 220 bytes for ESM, CJS and DTS is lower size. Besides that you always import just what you need. I plan to refactor type NestedPath to have better readability so this PR is not finished jet.
Main Dist size:
ESM dist/index.js 100.94 KB
ESM ⚡️ Build success in 106ms
CJS dist/index.cjs 108.53 KB
CJS ⚡️ Build success in 106ms
DTS Build start
DTS ⚡️ Build success in 2842ms
DTS dist/index.d.ts 178.31 KB
DTS dist/index.d.cts 178.31 KB

PR Dist size:
ESM dist/index.js 101.16 KB
ESM ⚡️ Build success in 137ms
CJS dist/index.cjs 108.75 KB
CJS ⚡️ Build success in 138ms
DTS Build start
DTS ⚡️ Build success in 2917ms
DTS dist/index.d.ts 178.30 KB
DTS dist/index.d.cts 178.30 KB

[fabian-hiller]

Thank you for the research. I think readability is subjective here and I prefer not to split up small functions unnecessarily but feel free to add comments to improve the readability of the individual parts of the function.