Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update ERC-2333: Move to Last Call #386

Open
wants to merge 7 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

CarlBeek
Copy link
Contributor

Bring ERC 2333, 2334, 2335 up to date.

These ERCs are already the standard for BLS keys as used within the Beacon chain. This PR brings the ERCs up to date and sets them to Last Call so they can become Final ASAP to line up with their actual status.

@eip-review-bot
Copy link
Collaborator

eip-review-bot commented Apr 17, 2024

File ERCS/erc-2333.md

Requires 1 more reviewers from @axic, @g11tech, @SamWilsn, @xinbenlv

File ERCS/erc-2334.md

Requires 1 more reviewers from @axic, @g11tech, @SamWilsn, @xinbenlv

File ERCS/erc-2335.md

Requires 1 more reviewers from @axic, @g11tech, @SamWilsn, @xinbenlv

@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot changed the title Update BLS Key standards Update ERC-2333: Move to Last Call Apr 17, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-ci label Apr 17, 2024
@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot changed the title Update ERC-2333: Move to Last Call Update ERC-2333: Move to Final May 1, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the w-ci label May 1, 2024
@CarlBeek
Copy link
Contributor Author

CarlBeek commented May 1, 2024

Taking this straight to final, there doesn't seem much sense in going via Last Call as this is already the standard across BLS key derivation

@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-ci label May 1, 2024
@eip-review-bot eip-review-bot changed the title Update ERC-2333: Move to Final Update ERC-2333: Move to Last Call May 28, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot removed the w-ci label May 28, 2024
@@ -1,32 +1,25 @@
---
eip: 2334
title: BLS12-381 Deterministic Account Hierarchy
description: BLS12-381 Deterministic account hierarchy structure
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Your description doesn't really add a lot of information that isn't already in the title. Maybe:

Suggested change
description: BLS12-381 Deterministic account hierarchy structure
description: Define the purpose of a key (or family of keys) within a tree of keys.

discussions-to: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/2338
status: Stagnant
discussions-to: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/bls-keys-related-erc-discussion-erc-2333-2334-2335/19774
status: Final
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
status: Final
status: Last Call
last-call-deadline: 2024-06-11

You'll need to go through a last call period.

discussions-to: https://github.com/ethereum/EIPs/issues/2339
status: Stagnant
discussions-to: https://ethereum-magicians.org/t/bls-keys-related-erc-discussion-erc-2333-2334-2335/19774
status: Final
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
status: Final
status: Last Call
last-call-deadline: 2024-06-11

@@ -1,36 +1,29 @@
---
eip: 2335
title: BLS12-381 Keystore
description: Keystore for storing BLS12-381 keys
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Suggested change
description: Keystore for storing BLS12-381 keys
description: JSON format for the storage and interchange of BLS12-381 private keys.

Your simple summary was great. Might as well re-use it!

Copy link

The commit 31e6d29 (as a parent of dc6a671) contains errors.
Please inspect the Run Summary for details.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the w-ci label May 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

4 participants