Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

feat(eibc): Expand list-demand-orders query with more parameters #851

Open
wants to merge 14 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

zale144
Copy link
Contributor

@zale144 zale144 commented Apr 17, 2024

Description


Closes #849

All items are required. Please add a note to the item if the item is not applicable and
please add links to any relevant follow-up issues.

PR review checkboxes:

I have...

  • Added a relevant changelog entry to the Unreleased section in CHANGELOG.md
  • Targeted PR against the correct branch
  • included the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • Linked to the GitHub issue with discussion and accepted design
  • Targets only one GitHub issue
  • Wrote unit and integration tests
  • Wrote relevant migration scripts if necessary
  • All CI checks have passed
  • Added relevant godoc comments
  • Updated the scripts for local run, e.g genesis_config_commands.sh if the PR changes parameters
  • Add an issue in the e2e-tests repo if necessary

SDK Checklist

  • Import/Export Genesis
  • Registered Invariants
  • Registered Events
  • Updated openapi.yaml
  • No usage of go map
  • No usage of time.Now()
  • Used fixed point arithmetic and not float arithmetic
  • Avoid panicking in Begin/End block as much as possible
  • No unexpected math Overflow
  • Used sendCoin and not SendCoins
  • Out-of-block compute is bounded
  • No serialized ID at the end of store keys
  • UInt to byte conversion should use BigEndian

Full security checklist here

----;

For Reviewer:

  • Confirmed the correct type prefix in the PR title
  • Reviewers assigned
  • Confirmed all author checklist items have been addressed

---;

After reviewer approval:

  • In case the PR targets the main branch, PR should not be squash merge in order to keep meaningful git history.
  • In case the PR targets a release branch, PR must be rebased.

@zale144 zale144 self-assigned this Apr 17, 2024
@zale144 zale144 force-pushed the zale144/849-list-demand-orders-filters branch from 43fc95c to 1e4569d Compare April 23, 2024 18:19
@zale144 zale144 changed the base branch from main to zale144/850-query-delayedack-by-type April 23, 2024 18:22
@zale144 zale144 changed the title Expand list-demand-orders query with more parameters chore(eibc): Expand list-demand-orders query with more parameters Apr 23, 2024
@zale144 zale144 marked this pull request as ready for review April 23, 2024 18:24
@zale144 zale144 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 23, 2024 18:24
@omritoptix omritoptix changed the title chore(eibc): Expand list-demand-orders query with more parameters feat(eibc): Expand list-demand-orders query with more parameters Apr 23, 2024
if err != nil {
return fmt.Errorf("limit must be an integer: %s", args[3])
}
request.Limit = int32(limit)
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Any reason why we use limit instead of Pagination in cosmos-sdk?

Copy link
Contributor Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

well, the intent of this added filtering is just for debugging, it's not supposed to be for end users

Copy link

This pull request has been automatically marked as stale because it has not had any recent activity. It will be closed if no further activity occurs. Thank you!

proto/dymension/eibc/demand_order.proto Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
proto/dymension/eibc/query.proto Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ func PendingByRollappIDByMaxHeight(
End: commontypes.RollappPacketByStatusByRollappIDByProofHeightPrefix(rollappID, status, maxProofHeight+1), // inclusive end
},
},
FilterFunc: func(packet commontypes.RollappPacket) bool { return true },
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

should define it (func(packet commontypes.RollappPacket) bool { return true } )and reuse for readability

Base automatically changed from zale144/850-query-delayedack-by-type to main May 29, 2024 06:57
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

state breaking? will require migration

@@ -177,6 +178,11 @@ func (k Keeper) ListDemandOrdersByStatus(ctx sdk.Context, status commontypes.Sta
for ; iterator.Valid(); iterator.Next() {
var val types.DemandOrder
k.cdc.MustUnmarshal(iterator.Value(), &val)
for _, opt := range opts {
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

the limit(limit int) option is bit miss the point here no?
u'll still process and unmarshal the entire query
I think better design for limit should break this iterator

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Add filters to list-demand-oders
4 participants