Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Adding ppc64le architecture support on travis-ci #76

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

kishorkunal-raj
Copy link

Hi,
I had added ppc64le(Linux on Power) architecture support on travis-ci in the PR and looks like its been successfully added. Also job for go 1.4 on ppc64le architecture is excluded as the version is not supported. I believe it is ready for the final review and merge. The travis ci build logs can be verified from the link below.
https://travis-ci.com/github/kishorkunal-raj/docopt.go/builds/191152052

Reason behind running tests on ppc64le: This package is included in the ppc64le versions of RHEL and Ubuntu - this allows the top of tree to be tested continuously as it is for Intel, making it easier to catch any possible regressions on ppc64le before the distros begin their clones and builds. This reduces the work in integrating this package into future versions of RHEL/Ubuntu.

Please have a look.

Regards,
Kishor Kunal Raj

@coveralls
Copy link

Coverage Status

Coverage remained the same at 88.261% when pulling 8a9b868 on kishorkunal-raj:master into ee0de3b on docopt:master.

@kishorkunal-raj
Copy link
Author

Any views on PR?

Copy link

@shakefu shakefu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Would be good to retarget after #75 gets merged since 1.4 will not be in the matrix, but otherwise it's harmless.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants