Recommendation 10 updates for look-back period and 2022-compliant response #343
Conversation
… reasoning to the documentation
…ing up the PlanDefinitions and CQL
| else if GetNegativeScreeningsCount(Screenings) > 0 then | ||
| '<br />*Positive for ' + Type + ': ' + | ||
| Combine(GetPositiveDates(Screenings), ', ') + | ||
| ' (' + ToString(GetNegativeScreeningsCount(Screenings)) + |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💯 way more readable, thanks for making that a more generic definition!
| if isScreeningRecommended | ||
| then 'Consider the benefits and risks of toxicology testing to assess for prescribed medications as well as other prescribed and nonprescribed controlled substances.' | ||
| else if "Applicable Because of Unexpected Results" | ||
| then 'Patient May Have Unexpected Toxicology Test Results' |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
💯 way more readable, thanks for making that a more generic definition!
| and MR.medication is Reference or (MR.medication in "Opioid analgesics with ambulatory misuse potential" | ||
| and not (MR.medication in "Non-synthetic opioid medications")) | ||
| and MR.medication is Reference or (MR.medication in "Opioid Analgesics with Ambulatory Misuse Potential" | ||
| and not (MR.medication in "Nonsynthetic Opioid Medications")) | ||
| else |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
just for myself to know: is this naming convention of capital starting letters documented anywhere?
| "code": [ { | ||
| "system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/observation-category", | ||
| "code": "laboratory" | ||
| } ] | ||
| } ] | ||
| }, { | ||
| "type": "Observation", |
| "code": [ { | ||
| "system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/observation-category", | ||
| "code": "laboratory" | ||
| } ] | ||
| } ] | ||
| }, { | ||
| "type": "Observation", |
| "code": [ { | ||
| "system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/observation-category", | ||
| "code": "laboratory" | ||
| } ] | ||
| } ] | ||
| }, { | ||
| "type": "Observation", |
| } ] | ||
| } ] | ||
| }, { | ||
| "type": "Observation", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
4x identical observations added in addition
| "path": "category", | ||
| "code": [ { | ||
| "system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/observation-category", | ||
| "code": "laboratory" |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
also here, many identical data requirments of type Observation.
| "code": [ { | ||
| "system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/observation-category", | ||
| "code": "laboratory" | ||
| } ] |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
also here, many identical data requirements of type Observation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Looking good! The only thing that I have noticed is that there is duplicated dataRequirement definitions for the resource type "Observation" of type laboratory in the following files:
- plandefinition/opioidcds-10.json
- library/OpioidCDSREC10.json
- plandefinition/opioidcds-10-patient-view.json
- plandefinition/opioidcds-10-order-sign.json
…lement with updated strategy
… positive results
…g and fixed issue with opiate screening referencing incorrect value set
Note: this PR requires an enhancement in the cqf-ruler to be approved and merged before it will pass testing (or use the following cqf-ruler branch for testing)