-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 32
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
images: fix centos-10 #6378
images: fix centos-10 #6378
Conversation
image-refresh centos-10 done: https://github.com/cockpit-project/bots/commits/image-refresh-centos-10-20240514-041151 |
SELinux failure galore:
NBDE fails:
|
Lovely :( Thanks for the cherry-pick. |
7e774dd
to
22f40f3
Compare
I have some more fixes queued. I also want a fresh build to pick up kdumpctl. |
...it's not available.
22f40f3
to
9dcd959
Compare
That failure reproduces. After installing packages, /etc/resolv.conf is a broken symlink. I noticed that during my initial experiments and thought it was a glitch, but it's systematic. Our initial image doesn't have systemd-resolved installed. But installing So: installing wireguard-tools breaks DNS, because installing systemd-resolved changes the symlink but doesn't start the service. I filed that as https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-37686 and will add a workaround. |
Installing wireguard-tools breaks DNS, see https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-37686 Add a workaround.
This unbreaks libvirt, so that we can start testing cockpit-machines. See https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-29893
9dcd959
to
7c27fdc
Compare
image-refresh centos-10 done: https://github.com/cockpit-project/bots/commits/image-refresh-centos-10-20240522-073543 |
Same as https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250930 in Fedora, but tracked in https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-37631 centos-10 has working `ausearch`, so this also needs to ignore its output. So the patterns are a bit more complex.
SELinux issues are https://issues.redhat.com/browse/RHEL-37631 , added ignore. |
Green now! It's @allisonkarlitskaya 's PR, so she can't formally review. But I'm good with the dhcp-change, and someone else needs to review my changes. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
✔️ 👍 (if I could).
Fixes #6376