Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

initial commit of simple rewriting of certain components of AssayTool… #145

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

yuanqing-wang
Copy link
Member

…s in NumPyro. targetting replicating functionality displaced in direct-fluorescence-assay

…s in NumPyro. targetting replicating functionality displaced in direct-fluorescence-assay
@alexjli
Copy link

alexjli commented Jun 14, 2021

Selection_999(131)

I think inference is still a bit unstable, which I'm working on. Attached above is one of the runs where the parameters are a little off (in particular, f_measure_var models measurement error in fluorescence with a true value of 10, while this inference run ends with a final value of about 0.5). The predictive model generally models the data pretty well regardless though.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

2 participants