Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Unify MG transfer operators by using MGTransferMF #913

Draft
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

peterrum
Copy link
Collaborator

@lpsaavedra @blaisb May I ask you to try out this branch now and then. In deal.II, we in the process of merging MGTransferMatrixFree and MGTransferGlobalCoarsening. The new class MGTransferMF is essentially the old MGTransferGlobalCoarsening with some features added to support local smoothing. I am still trying to reduce the setup costs of MGTransferMF. Once that is done the old content of the old MGTransferMatrixFree can be removed and will be replaced by the current content of MGTransferMF. All tests inside of deal.II are passing with MGTransferMF, which is a good sign. But maybe there some features (e.g., special constraints) that are not tested. In the case that you should observe any kinds of differences, I would like to ask you to report this; since the intentions is that the behavior is identical to the current state and diverging behavior would be considered as an unintentional bug.

@peterrum peterrum marked this pull request as draft October 21, 2023 16:56
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant