Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Disconnect from cds-hooks.org for IG Publisher migration #656

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

isaacvetter
Copy link
Member

Delete gh action.

Anything else needed here?

Delete gh action.
Copy link
Collaborator

@vadi2 vadi2 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Not that I can think of.

@jmandel ?

@jmandel
Copy link
Member

jmandel commented Mar 13, 2024

This seems fine for a start. Eventually do we want to keep the latest build visible at cds-hooks.org, perhaps with a new GitHub action that will run the publisher and use a deploy step?

@vadi2
Copy link
Collaborator

vadi2 commented Mar 14, 2024

I can put that together. How did current deploy to cds-hooks.org get the new content over?

@isaacvetter
Copy link
Member Author

Hey Guys,

>do we want to keep the latest build visible at cds-hooks.org, perhaps with a new GitHub action that will run the publisher and use a deploy step?

The current plan is to shift cds-hooks.org to contain informative content with a focus on community engagement, with links to the published spec(s) and the IG ci build. We haven't worked out sufficient technical details yet, but mkdocs and gh actions and gh hosting work pretty well for website editing and maintenance, so one repo for the IG and another for the cds-hooks.org website?

HL7 will also expect an IG to live in a repo within the HL7 organization. We do already have this one -- https://github.com/HL7/cds-hooks-hl7-site. So what probably makes sense is to host the IG in either HL7/cds-hooks-hl7-site or a new one, like HL7/cds-hooks and keep cds-hooks/docs as the source and publishing pipeline for cds-hooks.org.

What do you guys think about that?

@vadi2
Copy link
Collaborator

vadi2 commented Mar 14, 2024

That makes sense to me 👍

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants