Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FIX: Expect multiple rule matches for events.json #1952

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
May 23, 2024

Conversation

effigies
Copy link
Collaborator

This test is a bit weird; it seems to have been relying on arbitrary
pruning. There's nothing in the rules or code that now (as of #1940)
should prevent multiple rules from being returned.

If we do want a test to verify pruning, we should come up with a new
one.

Copy link

codecov bot commented Apr 22, 2024

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 85.68%. Comparing base (43a7117) to head (0dc4691).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##           master    #1952   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   85.68%   85.68%           
=======================================
  Files          91       91           
  Lines        3792     3792           
  Branches     1220     1220           
=======================================
  Hits         3249     3249           
  Misses        457      457           
  Partials       86       86           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

This test is a bit weird; it seems to have been relying on arbitrary
pruning. There's nothing in the rules or code that now (as of bids-standard#1940)
should prevent multiple rules from being returned.

If we do want a test to verify pruning, we should come up with a new
one.
@effigies effigies merged commit fffc35c into bids-standard:master May 23, 2024
30 of 33 checks passed
@effigies effigies deleted the fix/expected_matches branch May 23, 2024 19:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant