Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add cpdb support to speed up parsing #323

Open
wants to merge 34 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Add cpdb support to speed up parsing #323

wants to merge 34 commits into from

Conversation

a-r-j
Copy link
Owner

@a-r-j a-r-j commented Jun 26, 2023

What does this implement/fix? Explain your changes

Uses cpdb to parse PDB files for improved performance

What testing did you do to verify the changes in this PR?

Pull Request Checklist

  • Added a note about the modification or contribution to the ./CHANGELOG.md file (if applicable)
  • Added appropriate unit test functions in the ./graphein/tests/* directories (if applicable)
  • Modify documentation in the corresponding Jupyter Notebook under ./notebooks/ (if applicable)
  • Ran python -m py.test tests/ and make sure that all unit tests pass (for small modifications, it might be sufficient to only run the specific test file, e.g., python -m py.test tests/protein/test_graphs.py)
  • Checked for style issues by running black . and isort .

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Jul 6, 2023

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.    Quality Gate failed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
64.1% 64.1% Duplication

idea Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension sonarlint SonarLint

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Aug 31, 2023

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.    Quality Gate failed

Bug E 1 Bug
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
28.0% 28.0% Duplication

idea Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension sonarlint SonarLint

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Oct 28, 2023

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.    Quality Gate failed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 1 Code Smell

No Coverage information No Coverage information
25.5% 25.5% Duplication

idea Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension sonarlint SonarLint

@sonarcloud
Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Oct 28, 2023

SonarCloud Quality Gate failed.    Quality Gate failed

Bug A 0 Bugs
Vulnerability A 0 Vulnerabilities
Security Hotspot A 0 Security Hotspots
Code Smell A 0 Code Smells

No Coverage information No Coverage information
21.5% 21.5% Duplication

idea Catch issues before they fail your Quality Gate with our IDE extension sonarlint SonarLint

Copy link

sonarcloud bot commented Feb 7, 2024

Quality Gate Failed Quality Gate failed

Failed conditions

1 Security Hotspot
13.7% Duplication on New Code (required ≤ 5%)

See analysis details on SonarCloud

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

1 participant