Doc addition of the Collisional Analysis notebook #2191
Conversation
|
Check out this pull request on See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks. Powered by ReviewNB |
|
Thank you for submitting a pull request (PR) to PlasmaPy! ✨ The future of the project depends on contributors like you, so we deeply appreciate it! 🌱 Our contributor guide has information on:
The bottom of this page shows several checks that are run for every PR. Don't worry if something broke! We break stuff all the time. 😺 Click on "Details" to learn why a check didn't pass. Please also feel free to ask for help. We do that all the time as well. 🌸 You can find us in our chat room or weekly community meeting & office hours. Here are some tips:
If this PR is marked as ready for review, someone should stop by to provide a code review and offer suggestions soon. ✅ If you don't get a review within a few days, please feel free to send us a reminder. Please also use SI units within PlasmaPy, except when there is strong justification otherwise or in some examples. We thank you once again! |
github-actions
bot
added
docs
Codecov ReportPatch and project coverage have no change.
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## main #2191 +/- ##
=======================================
Coverage 98.37% 98.37%
=======================================
Files 98 98
Lines 8531 8531
=======================================
Hits 8392 8392
Misses 139 139 ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
github-actions
bot
removed
the
plasmapy.formulary
Co-authored-by: Nick Murphy <namurphy@cfa.harvard.edu>
Co-authored-by: Nick Murphy <namurphy@cfa.harvard.edu>
Co-authored-by: Nick Murphy <namurphy@cfa.harvard.edu>
|
yay |
ejohnson-96
changed the title
Co-authored-by: Nick Murphy <namurphy@cfa.harvard.edu>
Co-authored-by: Nick Murphy <namurphy@cfa.harvard.edu>
Co-authored-by: Nick Murphy <namurphy@cfa.harvard.edu>
| @@ -0,0 +1,513 @@ | |||
| { | |||
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| "$$\n", | ||
| "\n", | ||
| "\n", | ||
| "In these equations, $C_{1} = 2.60 \\times 10^{7} \\, {\\rm cm}^{3} \\, {\\rm km} \\, {\\rm K}^{3/2} \\, {\\rm s}^{-1} \\, {\\rm au}^{-1}$, $C_{2} = 1 \\, {\\rm cm}^{-3/2}{\\rm K}^{-3/2} $, $Z_\\alpha \\equiv q_\\alpha/q_{\\rm p} = 2$ is the $\\alpha$-proton relative charge, $\\mu_\\alpha \\equiv m_\\alpha/m_{\\rm p} \\approx 4$ is their relative mass, and $\\eta_{\\alpha{\\rm p}} \\equiv n_\\alpha/n_{\\rm p}$ is the their relative abundance.\n", |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
| "In these equations, $C_{1} = 2.60 \\times 10^{7} \\, {\\rm cm}^{3} \\, {\\rm km} \\, {\\rm K}^{3/2} \\, {\\rm s}^{-1} \\, {\\rm au}^{-1}$, $C_{2} = 1 \\, {\\rm cm}^{-3/2}{\\rm K}^{-3/2} $, $Z_\\alpha \\equiv q_\\alpha/q_{\\rm p} = 2$ is the $\\alpha$-proton relative charge, $\\mu_\\alpha \\equiv m_\\alpha/m_{\\rm p} \\approx 4$ is their relative mass, and $\\eta_{\\alpha{\\rm p}} \\equiv n_\\alpha/n_{\\rm p}$ is the their relative abundance.\n", | |
| "In these equations, $C_{1} = 2.60 \\times 10^{7}$ cm$^3$ km K$^{3/2}$ s$^{-1}$ au$^{-1}$, $C_{2} = 1 \\, {\\rm cm}^{-3/2}{\\rm K}^{-3/2} $, $Z_\\alpha \\equiv q_\\alpha/q_{\\rm p} = 2$ is the $\\alpha$-proton relative charge, $\\mu_\\alpha \\equiv m_\\alpha/m_{\\rm p} \\approx 4$ is their relative mass, and $\\eta_{\\alpha{\\rm p}} \\equiv n_\\alpha/n_{\\rm p}$ is the their relative abundance.\n", |
Description
Adds a notebook to walk the user through the collisional analysis functionality.
Motivation and context
Related issues