Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

Cleanup IContentManager #16077

Merged
merged 22 commits into from
May 22, 2024
Merged

Cleanup IContentManager #16077

merged 22 commits into from
May 22, 2024

Conversation

MikeAlhayek
Copy link
Member

@MikeAlhayek MikeAlhayek commented May 16, 2024 •
edited

Cleanup the IContentManager

Fix #16027

@MikeAlhayek MikeAlhayek requested a review from Piedone May 16, 2024 18:31
Piedone
Piedone requested changes May 16, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@Piedone Piedone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The build is failing.

@MikeAlhayek MikeAlhayek requested a review from Piedone May 16, 2024 21:30
@MikeAlhayek MikeAlhayek requested a review from Piedone May 17, 2024 17:03
@MikeAlhayek
Copy link
Member Author

@Piedone even better, I also Fixed #16027 by handling the all versions option.

@Piedone
Copy link
Member

Piedone commented May 17, 2024

Awesome!

Piedone
Piedone requested changes May 17, 2024
View reviewed changes
Copy link
Member

@Piedone Piedone left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@sebastienros can I get your second opinion, specifically on using VersionOptions options = null, i.e. an optional parameter instead of overloads with and without?

I think this is good but I'm wondering if I'm missing something. It's source-compatible but perhaps not binary-compatible, but 2.0 is breaking anyway, you have to recompile, it doesn't matter. Overloads are preferred instead of optional parameters if you need compatibility with all .NET languages, but that doesn't matter for us either. Anything else?

src/OrchardCore/OrchardCore.ContentManagement/DefaultContentManager.cs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/OrchardCore/OrchardCore.ContentManagement/DefaultContentManager.cs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/OrchardCore/OrchardCore.ContentManagement/DefaultContentManager.cs Show resolved Hide resolved
@Piedone Piedone mentioned this pull request May 17, 2024
Closed
MikeAlhayek and others added 4 commits May 17, 2024 11:32
sebastienros
sebastienros reviewed May 17, 2024
View reviewed changes
src/OrchardCore.Modules/OrchardCore.Contents/Razor/ContentRazorHelperExtensions.cs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
src/OrchardCore.Modules/OrchardCore.Contents/Razor/ContentRazorHelperExtensions.cs
/// <example>GetContentItemByIdAsync("4xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx").</example>
/// <returns>A content item with the specific id, or <c>null</c> if it doesn't exist.</returns>
public static Task<ContentItem> GetContentItemByIdAsync(this IOrchardHelper orchardHelper, string contentItemId, bool latest = false)
public static Task<ContentItem> GetContentItemByIdAsync(this IOrchardHelper orchardHelper, string contentItemId, VersionOptions option = null)
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

= null, why not the actual default value that is documented? I know this is what will be used internally but that would make more sense. If the other default changes for instance.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

VersionOptions is a class. How can we provide a default value to the argument?

src/OrchardCore/OrchardCore.ContentManagement.Abstractions/VersionOptions.cs Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
@MikeAlhayek MikeAlhayek requested a review from Piedone May 21, 2024 20:26
@MikeAlhayek MikeAlhayek merged commit 77c69c6 into main May 22, 2024
12 checks passed
@MikeAlhayek MikeAlhayek deleted the ma/remove-options-from-content-manager branch May 22, 2024 00:30
This was referenced Jun 1, 2024
Open
Open
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Reviewers

@sebastienros sebastienros sebastienros left review comments

@Piedone Piedone Piedone approved these changes

Assignees
No one assigned
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Remove VersionOptions.AllVersions
4 participants
@MikeAlhayek @Piedone @sebastienros @hishamco