Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

regression_1025: use the imp field in TEEC_Context #684

Conversation

JLLinaro
Copy link
Contributor

As the test xtest_tee_test_1025 uses a part of a struct from tee_client_api.h that is implementation defined, the test needed to be updated when the implementation defined parts of the structs in tee_client_api.h changed to use an imp field instead of separate fields.

Link: OP-TEE/optee_client#349
Reported-by: Tom Hebb tommyhebb@gmail.com
Signed-off-by: Julianus Larson julianus.larson@linaro.org

@jforissier
Copy link
Contributor

Reviewed-by: Jerome Forissier <jerome.forissier@linaro.org>

@jforissier
Copy link
Contributor

In the commit description: add missing parentheses after the function name: xtest_tee_test_1025()

@jenswi-linaro
Copy link
Contributor

Acked-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>

@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been marked as a stale pull request because it has been open (more than) 30 days with no activity. Remove the stale label or add a comment, otherwise this pull request will automatically be closed in 5 days. Note that you can always re-open a closed pull request at any time.

@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been marked as a stale pull request because it has been open (more than) 30 days with no activity. Remove the stale label or add a comment, otherwise this pull request will automatically be closed in 5 days. Note that you can always re-open a closed pull request at any time.

@github-actions
Copy link

This pull request has been marked as a stale pull request because it has been open (more than) 30 days with no activity. Remove the stale label or add a comment, otherwise this pull request will automatically be closed in 5 days. Note that you can always re-open a closed pull request at any time.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Oct 27, 2023
@jenswi-linaro
Copy link
Contributor

Ping @JLLinaro ?

@JLLinaro JLLinaro force-pushed the fix_imp_part_of_types_in_tee_client_api branch from 6b38904 to 92d96de Compare October 27, 2023 11:37
@JLLinaro
Copy link
Contributor Author

Ping @JLLinaro ?

Sorry, but now it has been fixed.

@jforissier
Copy link
Contributor

jforissier commented Oct 27, 2023

Better to use the imperative mood ("Update tests...") rather than the past tense ("Updated tests..."). Other than that this is fine:

Reviewed-by: Jerome Forissier <jerome.forissier@linaro.org>

Since there is a dependency on OP-TEE/optee_client#349 I will merge this when both are ready. Thanks!

Copy link

This pull request has been marked as a stale pull request because it has been open (more than) 30 days with no activity. Remove the stale label or add a comment, otherwise this pull request will automatically be closed in 5 days. Note that you can always re-open a closed pull request at any time.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Nov 27, 2023
@jforissier
Copy link
Contributor

@JLLinaro please update the commit subject as requested and add the Acked-by: and Reviewed-by: tags given above. Thanks!

@github-actions github-actions bot removed the Stale label Nov 28, 2023
Copy link

This pull request has been marked as a stale pull request because it has been open (more than) 30 days with no activity. Remove the stale label or add a comment, otherwise this pull request will automatically be closed in 5 days. Note that you can always re-open a closed pull request at any time.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the Stale label Dec 29, 2023
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Jan 3, 2024
@jenswi-linaro jenswi-linaro reopened this Jan 3, 2024
@github-actions github-actions bot closed this Jan 9, 2024
@jforissier jforissier reopened this Mar 28, 2024
As the test xtest_tee_test_1025() uses a part of a struct from
tee_client_api.h that is implementation defined, the test
needed to be updated when the implementation defined parts of
the structs in tee_client_api.h changed to use an imp field
instead of separate fields.

Signed-off-by: Julianus Larson <julianus.larson@linaro.org>
Reported-by: Tom Hebb <tommyhebb@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jerome Forissier <jerome.forissier@linaro.org>
Acked-by: Jens Wiklander <jens.wiklander@linaro.org>
@JLLinaro JLLinaro force-pushed the fix_imp_part_of_types_in_tee_client_api branch from 92d96de to 9afc5e5 Compare March 28, 2024 10:42
@jforissier
Copy link
Contributor

@JLLinaro please make the subject "regression_1025: use the imp field in TEEC_Context". I'll pick that and create a new pull request because some GP files need to be adapted, too. Thanks!

@JLLinaro JLLinaro changed the title xtest_tee_test_1025: Move OP-TEE defined fields into an imp struct regression_1025: use the imp field in TEEC_Context Mar 28, 2024
@jforissier
Copy link
Contributor

I picked this change in #736, therefore closing this one. Thanks @JLLinaro.

@jforissier jforissier closed this Mar 28, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

None yet

3 participants