Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

NO superpixel norm #34

Open
PumpkinRun opened this issue Jul 28, 2020 · 7 comments
Open

NO superpixel norm #34

PumpkinRun opened this issue Jul 28, 2020 · 7 comments

Comments

@PumpkinRun
Copy link

Thank you for your work,and release it. When i use ORB_slam2 model RGBd
to run Kitti dataset, sequence 00, there is no problem. And i can get the ideal result. But i processing our outdoor road data, it don't extract the super pixels, and don't generate the point cloud. I don't know which problem it is. Can you help me to solve it? I am looking forward your reply!!! Thank you!

2020-07-28 18-15-46屏幕截图

2020-07-28 18-15-56屏幕截图

2020-07-28 18-25-42屏幕截图

2020-07-28 18-13-03屏幕截图

@Shame-fight
Copy link

I have the same problem,and the spimage also can not received when using mynteye camera,but the surfel_color02.bag is right.so whether need to modify some code to solve these problems, except for vins_realsense.launch.looking forward for your reply.thanks~ @dvorak0 @WayneTimer @groundmelon @shaojie

@PumpkinRun
Copy link
Author

Hi~~,At present, I can extract super pixels. When reading depth map, pay attention to the unit of depth image is meter. After changing the information of reading depth map in ' publisher.py ' , I can get super pixels, but the reconstruction effect is very poor, running orbslam2 rgbd mode , Core dump was appeared. Because the quliaty of depth image is poor? Hope to provide some ideas and solutions. Thanks!!! I am looking forward to your replay!

647715628
2020-07-30 14-54-47屏幕截图

@Shame-fight
Copy link

Successfully running the program is good news, although the effect is not very good. Can you tell me where I need to modify pubilsher.py? Are there other codes that need to be modified? I am using a stereo camera, not an rgb-d camera. I cannot run this program normally at the moment, Thanks in advance. Do you have e-mail or wechat or qq,It is more convenient to communicate with chat tools.
@PumpkinRun

@WANG-KX
Copy link
Member

WANG-KX commented Aug 1, 2020

Hi, I am here for help.
@PumpkinRun can you convert the depth maps into point clouds and show me? From the normal map, it seems quite noisy.

@WANG-KX
Copy link
Member

WANG-KX commented Aug 1, 2020

@Shame-fight The messages should be well synchronized. If you do not receive any messages please go to

void SurfelMap::image_input(const sensor_msgs::ImageConstPtr &image_input)
,
void SurfelMap::synchronize_msgs()
,
void SurfelMap::depth_input(const sensor_msgs::ImageConstPtr &depth_input)
, and
void SurfelMap::orb_results_input(
for debugging.
I do not know much about your senesors and configuration, so please refer to the example bag and configure your settings.

@PumpkinRun
Copy link
Author

Hi, I am here for help.
@PumpkinRun can you convert the depth maps into point clouds and show me? From the normal map, it seems quite noisy.
Hello, Thank you for your reply. I had converted the depth maps into point clouds and discoveried it is terrible.

  1. This is kitti 00 sequence image00 , 000000.png and 000000.npy.

Screenshot from 2020-08-05 10-13-40

Screenshot from 2020-08-05 10-07-54

  1. This is owner data including image_raw and point clouds.

001247
Screenshot from 2020-08-05 10-22-24

So, It should be the problem of depth map, which makes the reconstruction result poor

@WANG-KX
Copy link
Member

WANG-KX commented Aug 5, 2020

Hi, @PumpkinRun not sure what's on the ground. It does not seems right, right?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants