Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Refactoring to support control sync rework #387

Draft
wants to merge 18 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

danmatichuk
Copy link
Collaborator

No description provided.

fixes issue where GUI would hang when trying to
navigate to display a choice tree (i.e. prompt)
this is a forward-looking change to support more
expressive control flow synchronization
this is an intermediate step in adding additional ways that a node
can be queued to be processed - in particular, handling node merge
logic via the scheduler
This clears up some of the ambiguity in the SyncPoint data which otherwise
had lots of implicit assumptions about the run-time contents of the NodeEntry
for each sync point

A SingleNodeEntry is functionally equivalent to a NodeEntry that's
annotated with the fact that it's single-sided
…r patched

this is essentially the same as Const, but useful for cases where
we want to establish OrdF or TestEquality
this now builds, and changes the control flow synchronization
to occur as a first-class operation that is explicitly scheduled

this provides some flexibility for handling additional cases
for mismatched control flow, but this is still work in progress
@thebendavis thebendavis linked an issue May 29, 2024 that may be closed by this pull request
@thebendavis thebendavis mentioned this pull request May 31, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Generalize and stabilize control flow alignment
1 participant