fix(@types/k6): exact optional property type mismatch

[wuhkuh]

The provided type did not compile when exactOptionalPropertyTypes is configured. This commit resolves the compiler error encountered when compiling in this mode.

---

Please fill in this template.

• Use a meaningful title for the pull request. Include the name of the package modified.
• Test the change in your own code. (Compile and run.)
• Add or edit tests to reflect the change.
• Follow the advice from the readme.
• Avoid common mistakes.
• Run pnpm test <package to test>.

If changing an existing definition:

• Provide a URL to documentation or source code which provides context for the suggested changes: <https://www.typescriptlang.org/tsconfig/#exactOptionalPropertyTypes>
• If this PR brings the type definitions up to date with a new version of the JS library, update the version number in the package.json.

---

I can't seem to get the packages tested individually (my Node+TS setup is segfaulting since a recent upgrade).
So I'll try to rely on CI to test my changes; my goal here is to make my local patch available to the repository, no strings attached.

Do note that Node's types also had this typing problem a while ago.
I opted for this solution to not break the signature of the typing library, but there are other solutions, too, such as allowing explicit undefineds in the extended types.

[typescript-bot]

@wuhkuh Thank you for submitting this PR! I see this is your first time submitting to DefinitelyTyped 👋 — I'm the local bot who will help you through the process of getting things through.

This is a live comment which I will keep updated.

1 package in this PR

• k6 — on npm, on unpkg

Code Reviews

This PR can be merged once it's reviewed.

You can test the changes of this PR in the Playground.

Status

• ✅ No merge conflicts
• ✅ Continuous integration tests have passed
• 🕐 Most recent commit is approved by type definition owners or DT maintainers

Once every item on this list is checked, I'll ask you for permission to merge and publish the changes.

Inactive

This PR has been inactive for 15 days — please try to get reviewers!

---

Diagnostic Information: What the bot saw about this PR

{
  "type": "info",
  "now": "-",
  "pr_number": 69636,
  "author": "wuhkuh",
  "headCommitOid": "aaf2e9157676f34a3191f24bdfcd7793ef22e305",
  "mergeBaseOid": "acac6a1f25ff44f786b1f21216fb55d0699b7dd3",
  "lastPushDate": "2024-05-18T10:07:10.000Z",
  "lastActivityDate": "2024-05-28T19:47:11.000Z",
  "maintainerBlessed": "Waiting for Code Reviews",
  "hasMergeConflict": false,
  "isFirstContribution": true,
  "tooManyFiles": false,
  "hugeChange": false,
  "popularityLevel": "Popular",
  "pkgInfo": [
    {
      "name": "k6",
      "kind": "edit",
      "files": [
        {
          "path": "types/k6/http.d.ts",
          "kind": "definition"
        }
      ],
      "owners": [
        "MStoykov",
        "codebien",
        "oleiade",
        "olegbespalov",
        "nicolevanderhoeven",
        "ankur22",
        "inancgumus",
        "ka3de",
        "joanlopez"
      ],
      "addedOwners": [],
      "deletedOwners": [],
      "popularityLevel": "Popular"
    }
  ],
  "reviews": [],
  "mainBotCommentID": 2118757576,
  "ciResult": "pass"
}

[typescript-bot]

Hey @wuhkuh,

😒 Your PR doesn't modify any tests, so it's hard to know what's being fixed, and your changes might regress in the future. Please consider adding tests to cover the change you're making. Including tests allows this PR to be merged by yourself and the owners of this module.

This can potentially save days of time for you!

[typescript-bot]

🔔 @mstoykov @codebien @oleiade @olegbespalov @nicolevanderhoeven @ankur22 @inancgumus @ka3de @joanlopez — please review this PR in the next few days. Be sure to explicitly select Approve or Request Changes in the GitHub UI so I know what's going on.

[typescript-bot]

Re-ping @mstoykov, @codebien, @oleiade, @olegbespalov, @nicolevanderhoeven, @ankur22, @inancgumus, @ka3de, @joanlopez:

This PR has been out for over a week, yet I haven't seen any reviews.

Could someone please give it some attention? Thanks!