Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Check what would be broken if do not add all the identifiers to functions map. #63993

Merged
merged 8 commits into from
May 24, 2024

Conversation

KochetovNicolai
Copy link
Member

@KochetovNicolai KochetovNicolai commented May 16, 2024

Changelog category (leave one):

  • Bug Fix (user-visible misbehavior in an official stable release)

Changelog entry (a user-readable short description of the changes that goes to CHANGELOG.md):

Fix an Cyclic aliases error for cyclic aliases of different type (expression and function). Fixes #63205

@robot-ch-test-poll1 robot-ch-test-poll1 added the pr-not-for-changelog This PR should not be mentioned in the changelog label May 16, 2024
@robot-ch-test-poll1
Copy link
Contributor

robot-ch-test-poll1 commented May 16, 2024

This is an automated comment for commit 741e0ae with description of existing statuses. It's updated for the latest CI running

❌ Click here to open a full report in a separate page

Check nameDescriptionStatus
A SyncThere's no description for the check yet, please add it to tests/ci/ci_config.py:CHECK_DESCRIPTIONS⏳ pending
AST fuzzerRuns randomly generated queries to catch program errors. The build type is optionally given in parenthesis. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help❌ failure
CI runningA meta-check that indicates the running CI. Normally, it's in success or pending state. The failed status indicates some problems with the PR⏳ pending
Mergeable CheckChecks if all other necessary checks are successful❌ failure
Stateless testsRuns stateless functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc❌ failure
Upgrade checkRuns stress tests on server version from last release and then tries to upgrade it to the version from the PR. It checks if the new server can successfully startup without any errors, crashes or sanitizer asserts❌ failure
Successful checks
Check nameDescriptionStatus
Bugfix validationChecks that either a new test (functional or integration) or there some changed tests that fail with the binary built on master branch✅ success
ClickBenchRuns [ClickBench](https://github.com/ClickHouse/ClickBench/) with instant-attach table✅ success
ClickHouse build checkBuilds ClickHouse in various configurations for use in further steps. You have to fix the builds that fail. Build logs often has enough information to fix the error, but you might have to reproduce the failure locally. The cmake options can be found in the build log, grepping for cmake. Use these options and follow the general build process✅ success
Compatibility checkChecks that clickhouse binary runs on distributions with old libc versions. If it fails, ask a maintainer for help✅ success
Docker keeper imageThe check to build and optionally push the mentioned image to docker hub✅ success
Docker server imageThe check to build and optionally push the mentioned image to docker hub✅ success
Docs checkBuilds and tests the documentation✅ success
Fast testNormally this is the first check that is ran for a PR. It builds ClickHouse and runs most of stateless functional tests, omitting some. If it fails, further checks are not started until it is fixed. Look at the report to see which tests fail, then reproduce the failure locally as described here✅ success
Flaky testsChecks if new added or modified tests are flaky by running them repeatedly, in parallel, with more randomization. Functional tests are run 100 times with address sanitizer, and additional randomization of thread scheduling. Integration tests are run up to 10 times. If at least once a new test has failed, or was too long, this check will be red. We don't allow flaky tests, read the doc✅ success
Install packagesChecks that the built packages are installable in a clear environment✅ success
Integration testsThe integration tests report. In parenthesis the package type is given, and in square brackets are the optional part/total tests✅ success
PR CheckThere's no description for the check yet, please add it to tests/ci/ci_config.py:CHECK_DESCRIPTIONS✅ success
Performance ComparisonMeasure changes in query performance. The performance test report is described in detail here. In square brackets are the optional part/total tests✅ success
Stateful testsRuns stateful functional tests for ClickHouse binaries built in various configurations -- release, debug, with sanitizers, etc✅ success
Stress testRuns stateless functional tests concurrently from several clients to detect concurrency-related errors✅ success
Style checkRuns a set of checks to keep the code style clean. If some of tests failed, see the related log from the report✅ success
Unit testsRuns the unit tests for different release types✅ success

@novikd novikd self-assigned this May 17, 2024
@novikd novikd added the analyzer Issues and pull-requests related to new analyzer label May 17, 2024
@KochetovNicolai KochetovNicolai marked this pull request as ready for review May 22, 2024 09:28
Copy link
Member

@novikd novikd left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

In general LGTM. It's better to remove the commented code, QueryAnalysisPass.cpp is already quite big.

@@ -471,7 +471,6 @@ struct TableExpressionData
return buffer.str();
}
};

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Accidental change?

src/Analyzer/Passes/QueryAnalysisPass.cpp Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Comment on lines +2944 to 2947
if (!alias_node)
throw Exception(ErrorCodes::LOGICAL_ERROR,
"Node with alias {} is not valid. In scope {}",
identifier_bind_part,
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I think it's better to move this check inside of ScopeAliases and make ScopeAliases::find return QueryTreeNodePtr instead of QueryTreeNodePtr *. This line checks that the alias map is filled with correct data.

Copy link
Member Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I don't know how to do it properly:

  • There is a place where it's possible to not find the alias:
    auto * alias_it = scope.aliases.find(identifier_lookup, ScopeAliases::FindOption::FULL_NAME);
    //auto alias_it = scope.alias_name_to_expression_node->find(identifier_lookup.identifier.getFullName());
    if (alias_it && (*alias_it)->getNodeType() == QueryTreeNodeType::COLUMN)
    {
    const auto & column_node = (*alias_it)->as<ColumnNode &>();
    if (column_node.getColumnSource()->getNodeType() == QueryTreeNodeType::ARRAY_JOIN)
    prefer_column_name_to_alias = true;
  • We can replace alias node to resolved one later
    alias_node = lookup_result.resolved_identifier;

So I can't return QueryTreeNodePtr because it won't be possible to update the alias map, and I can't use QueryTreeNodePtr & because it's ok to not find an alias, and I can't use std::optional<QueryTreeNodePtr &> because this is not supported.

Co-authored-by: Dmitry Novik <n0vik@clickhouse.com>
@robot-ch-test-poll4 robot-ch-test-poll4 added pr-bugfix Pull request with bugfix, not backported by default and removed pr-not-for-changelog This PR should not be mentioned in the changelog labels May 23, 2024
robot-ch-test-poll4 added a commit that referenced this pull request May 24, 2024
…0d3ac170eb3e26e2f4fb59cd1addb

Cherry pick #63993 to 24.5: Check what would be broken if do not add all the identifiers to functions map.
robot-clickhouse added a commit that referenced this pull request May 24, 2024
novikd added a commit that referenced this pull request May 27, 2024
Backport #63993 to 24.5: Check what would be broken if do not add all the identifiers to functions map.
robot-ch-test-poll added a commit that referenced this pull request May 27, 2024
…0d3ac170eb3e26e2f4fb59cd1addb

Cherry pick #63993 to 24.3: Check what would be broken if do not add all the identifiers to functions map.
robot-clickhouse added a commit that referenced this pull request May 27, 2024
robot-ch-test-poll added a commit that referenced this pull request May 27, 2024
…0d3ac170eb3e26e2f4fb59cd1addb

Cherry pick #63993 to 24.4: Check what would be broken if do not add all the identifiers to functions map.
robot-clickhouse added a commit that referenced this pull request May 27, 2024
@robot-ch-test-poll robot-ch-test-poll added the pr-backports-created Backport PRs are successfully created, it won't be processed by CI script anymore label May 27, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
analyzer Issues and pull-requests related to new analyzer pr-backports-created Backport PRs are successfully created, it won't be processed by CI script anymore pr-backports-created-cloud pr-bugfix Pull request with bugfix, not backported by default pr-synced-to-cloud The PR is synced to the cloud repo v24.3-must-backport v24.4-must-backport
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Cyclic aliases for identifier in valid query
7 participants