增加自定义其他编译器添加选项文件的选项功能

[2531]

你在什么场景下需要该功能？

使用非GCC系的编译器（例如TASKING）时，添加选项文件不是使用@file格式，所以无法使用xmake构建。参考 #4855

描述可能的解决方案

希望可以添加配置自定义该选项，然后默认为@file形式。

描述你认为的候选方案

无

其他信息

No response

[Issues-translate-bot]

Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically.

---

Title: Add the option function of customizing other compilers to add option files

In what scenario do you need this feature?

When using a non-GCC compiler (such as TASKING), the added option file does not use the @file format, so it cannot be built using xmake. Reference #4855

Describe possible solutions

I hope you can add configuration to customize this option, and then default to the @file form.

Describe your alternatives

none

other information

No response

[waruqi]

这个目前没办法，只能提 pr 给 xmake ，让它内置支持未知 compiler 的处理，目前的 custom toolchain 只能对已知的 compiler 进行自定义，比如 gcc/clang系，msvc, ...

除非后续提供开放式 api 能够完整自定义扩展未知编译器的支持，但这个需要很多的工作量，并且需要花时间去设计 api 暂时没空搞。。

所以你想支持使用未知编译器，要么直接提 pr 过来支持上，要么提 feature request 到 issues，然后耐心等待

[Issues-translate-bot]

Bot detected the issue body's language is not English, translate it automatically.

---

There is currently no way to do this. We can only submit pr to xmake so that it has built-in support for unknown compiler processing. The current custom toolchain can only customize known compilers, such as gcc/clang system, msvc,...

Unless an open API is provided in the future that can completely customize and extend the support of unknown compilers, this will require a lot of work and will take time to design the API, which I have no time to do at the moment. .

So if you want to support the use of unknown compilers, you can either directly submit a PR for support, or submit a feature request to issues, and then wait patiently.