-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 71
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
When can we expect Tus 2.0 implementation for .NET? #208
Comments
Hi! Resumable Uploads For Http (working name was "tus2") is new proposed standard by the IETF. The code related to this spec is located in POC/tus2 and has been verified to work with the latest draft spec (v 01 as of this writing). The nuget package won't contain this code until the draft becomes an RFC and the timeline for that is unclear. You can follow the work over at the IETF's github page. The code in the POC/tus2 branch has been verified to work with the clients that are currently available so it should be ready to use by compiling it and including it in your projects. See clients and compatibility list here. |
According to Marius's post there is a seperate Tus 2.0 release (in go) where IETF status kept as draft which has lots of new features. From the dates on POC/tus2 looks like it is eariler than this announcement. Does this include all the improvements that post is talking about? |
I can see why this is confusing. :) The linked blog post announces the new tusd 2.0 release (notice the last Hope this clears it up. |
Yes it does, thanks for clarification. From the blog post I understand tusd 2.0 has reliability and performance improvements (regardless of the tus protocol version). I am assuming that there might be some areas of improvements for tusdotnet based on the updated go implementation. Are you planning on carrying over any improvements? |
Great! Most of the improvements doesn't really apply to the dotnet version as these are specific to the go implementation. tusd and tusdotnet live their own lives and are not really a 1:1 comparison. There are ongoing work in tusdotnet to improve performance and resilience (see e.g. #205 ). I think the idea of backporting the locking behavior from |
No description provided.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: