Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Communicate that Timber v2 is more than a templating system for WordPress #2334

Open
szepeviktor opened this issue Oct 7, 2020 · 6 comments

Comments

@szepeviktor
Copy link
Contributor

szepeviktor commented Oct 7, 2020

Timber helps you create fully-customized WordPress themes faster with more sustainable code.

Currently we suggest that Timber can only be used for templating thus outputting (HTML) content.

It would be nice to list in what aspects Timber v2 is more than that.

@szepeviktor szepeviktor changed the title Communicate thet Timber v2 is more than a templating system for WordPress Communicate that Timber v2 is more than a templating system for WordPress Oct 7, 2020
@acobster
Copy link
Collaborator

acobster commented Oct 7, 2020

Good idea @szepeviktor! I completely agree. The big sell for us at SiteCrafting was not just that you could use Twig (although that was a significant factor) - it was that you could write in a much more OO style that encouraged a more disciplined separation of concerns. In particular, it allowed us to get much closer to the MVC pattern.

Of course WP still manages to find plenty of ways to break those abstractions 😛 so my only caveat would be against making absolute-sounding statements like, "Timber lets you write MVC code in WordPress."

@jarednova
Copy link
Member

Absolute-sounding statements? But that's what marketing is all about!

@acobster
Copy link
Collaborator

acobster commented Oct 9, 2020

@jarednova you're right, that's literally the only thing that marketing is about. What I actually meant to say is that we should only EVER make absolute statements!

@jarednova
Copy link
Member

there we go, that's the spirit!!

@Levdbas
Copy link
Member

Levdbas commented May 12, 2023

I've added 2.0 and docs labels since I think this is something we really need to look into. A lot of hard went into the fine folks that worked on 2.x for so long, so a bit of marketing is deserved.

@gchtr gchtr added 2.x Future and removed 2.0 labels May 17, 2023
@gchtr
Copy link
Member

gchtr commented May 17, 2023

Yes, I agree. But let this issue not be a blocker to release, let’s tackle this after the release.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

5 participants