should we drop 'Content hosts'?

[jeremylenz]

A "content host" is simply a host that has been registered with subscription-manager.

With the Content Hosts legacy web UI going away soon and the combination of the Content Hosts and All Hosts into a single All Hosts page, we've been moving toward just using the term "hosts" rather than "content hosts." Should we remove "content hosts" from our documentation everywhere and make "hosts" the new standard? I think this may be a bit less confusing and more consistent.

[ekohl]

Host and (if needed specifically) host with content sounds like a good idea to me.

[maximiliankolb]

If Foreman Web UI drops the term/page "content hosts", docs will obviously follow, yes.

[Lennonka]

Yes.