Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Self hosting #1

Open
astingengo opened this issue Mar 8, 2023 · 20 comments
Open

Self hosting #1

astingengo opened this issue Mar 8, 2023 · 20 comments

Comments

@astingengo
Copy link

Hi,

When do you think the self hosting it will be available [like in docker into a raspberry pi?]

@dwarf-king-hreidmar
Copy link

I come here every few weeks to check. I'm willing to pay into a bounty to make it happen!

@sunbl0ck
Copy link

I can haz self hosting?

@binaryben
Copy link

Will this work with the mobile apps and will it require a subscription if self-hosted? Many thanks for your good work!

@thecodrr
Copy link
Contributor

thecodrr commented May 1, 2023

@binaryben yes and no. Self hosting will be free (people can donate/contribute/subscribe but it won't be mandatory).

@binaryben
Copy link

@thecodrr Thats very exciting! A truely FOSS potential alternative to Standard Notes. Will definitely be looking at donating if I end up using it.

@andersonpem
Copy link

On the watch for this.

@targor
Copy link

targor commented Sep 15, 2023

When i understand this correctly, then only one point in the todo list is still open that prevents us from using the self hosting, and that would be the "Publish on DockerHub" and maybe the documentation of it? The changing of settings urls in the client wont affect the server directly right? ..

As this seems to me not so very complicated to implement, could it be that you just intent to never implement it? It now has been some time and the selfhosting is still not available. I would really love to host this thing on my own and would appreciate if you can finish the server. I know you maybe have a lot other work to do, but it would be cool if you could finish the server or.. the "uploading of the docker image to dockerhub" soon :).

@ijustyce
Copy link

When i understand this correctly, then only one point in the todo list is still open that prevents us from using the self hosting, and that would be the "Publish on DockerHub" and maybe the documentation of it? The changing of settings urls in the client wont affect the server directly right? ..

As this seems to me not so very complicated to implement, could it be that you just intent to never implement it? It now has been some time and the selfhosting is still not available. I would really love to host this thing on my own and would appreciate if you can finish the server. I know you maybe have a lot other work to do, but it would be cool if you could finish the server or.. the "uploading of the docker image to dockerhub" soon :).

After waiting for self host for more than half a year, I used outline (https://github.com/outline/outline)

@dwarf-king-hreidmar
Copy link

On a more positive note I'm happy to help with a helm chart once the image is finalized and published.

@thecodrr
Copy link
Contributor

thecodrr commented Oct 7, 2023

As this seems to me not so very complicated to implement, could it be that you just intent to never implement it? It now has been some time and the selfhosting is still not available. I would really love to host this thing on my own and would appreciate if you can finish the server. I know you maybe have a lot other work to do, but it would be cool if you could finish the server or.. the "uploading of the docker image to dockerhub" soon :).

It will be done when it will be done. There is no timeline and we have made no promises as to when this might happen. I want to be very clear, though, that we do intend to add support for self hosting and it is one of our long term goals. The good news is that things are rapidly moving towards making this a reality. The problem, currently, is this:

We haven't yet finalized the Sync API. Making the sync server self hostable before that would be a bad idea as everyone would have to do a huge migration. Once we are done with the necessary changes and things have been fully stabilized, self hosting won't take long.

I really do appreciate everyone's patience in this regard.

@dwarf-king-hreidmar
Copy link

dwarf-king-hreidmar commented Oct 7, 2023 via email

@Aiakio
Copy link

Aiakio commented Oct 8, 2023

@binaryben yes and no. Self hosting will be free (people can donate/contribute/subscribe but it won't be mandatory).

Does that mean, pro features will be available on the self-hosted version without paying for a subscription?

@rainyskye
Copy link

Does that mean, pro features will be available on the self-hosted version without paying for a subscription?

As far as I can see yes.

u/thewisefarmerr - "Well, if someone would be willing, the could use Notesnook 100% for free by self hosting everything and enabling pro features on the clients."

Source: https://www.reddit.com/r/opensource/comments/x3ds2w/notesnook_is_now_open_source/impmrul/

@Mekacher-Anis
Copy link

updates on this? keep up the great work!!

@bleomycin
Copy link

Has there been any public update on the status of this? I have been a paying customer of Notesnook since Sept 2022 entirely because self hosting was listed as a coming soon feature. I wanted to support that development. I actually barely even use the app and continue to pay for this reason.

I never expected self hosting to remove all license fee's and want it purely to have full control of my data. I know I'm not alone in feeling a bit nervous that this may never get implemented due to the lack of updates on this topic for so long. I'm sure many of us would very much appreciate some form of official communication about this feature one way or the other.

@thecodrr
Copy link
Contributor

thecodrr commented Mar 9, 2024

@bleomycin thank you for your support; we really do appreciate it. I understand your frustration but I assure you that we 100% want to make self hosting of Notesnook possible. The current roadmap looks like this:

  1. v3 release
  2. Self hosting
  3. Third party audit

Please note that there are no planned/promised dates for any of the above so everyone's patience is really appreciated.

@Littleweisheit
Copy link

@bleomycin thank you for your support; we really do appreciate it. I understand your frustration but I assure you that we 100% want to make self hosting of Notesnook possible. The current roadmap looks like this:

1. v3 release

2. Self hosting

3. Third party audit

Please note that there are no planned/promised dates for any of the above so everyone's patience is really appreciated.

v3 has been released, looks like self-hosting is on the way!

@binaryben
Copy link

v3 has been released, looks like self-hosting is on the way!

Hmm, maybe… The option to add a URL to a self-hosted server seems to be missing from the iOS app now.

Can anyone confirm if it’s still there but just moved?

@thecodrr
Copy link
Contributor

An update for those waiting: v3 release is done. Next step (after we enter a little bit more stable territory with v3) is self hosting as promised.

@luisogandob
Copy link

Great product! I just discovered today. Self hosting will put the cherry on this. Several products out there doesn't charge for self host in order to get more users that recommend the product to impulse the paid hosted version. To be real, this can easily compete with EverNote and not all users can host a functional server.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests