Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add page which describes the "redisless" setup #703

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
May 24, 2024

Conversation

andyundso
Copy link
Contributor

Type of PR (feature, enhancement, bug fix, etc.)

Documentation

Description

This PR adds a new page which describes how to setup StimulusReflex without Redis. I extracted it into a separate page because I felt it was too much to rewrite all the existing documentation, which relies on Redis. I assume most people will use Redis, and the "redisless" configuration likely is a niche thingy.

Fixes #684

Why should this be added

Good to know for people that StimulusReflex can work without Redis.

Checklist

  • My code follows the style guidelines of this project
  • Checks (StandardRB & Prettier-Standard) are passing

Copy link

netlify bot commented May 16, 2024

Deploy Preview for stimulusreflex ready!

Name Link
🔨 Latest commit 03ab57e
🔍 Latest deploy log https://app.netlify.com/sites/stimulusreflex/deploys/6650bdf3b4012d000842cb73
😎 Deploy Preview https://deploy-preview-703--stimulusreflex.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile
Toggle QR Code...

QR Code

Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

Copy link
Member

@marcoroth marcoroth left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thank you @andyundso! 🙏🏼

@marcoroth marcoroth merged commit e9d3484 into stimulusreflex:main May 24, 2024
13 of 14 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

solid_cache seems to work as well as Rails cache store
2 participants