You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
Describe the solution you'd like
Right now, the UnitBlock has an attribute for each type of element. However, this does not scale well, does not adhere to good practices of object-oriented programming and it is not intuitive when generic statements are in the mix. For instance, let's imagine a conditional statement has a atomic unit in its blocks. Should the atomic unit also be added to the atomic_units attribute? It doesn't make sense.
Describe alternatives you've considered
The UnitBlock should have a single attribute for statements.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Describe the solution you'd like
Right now, the UnitBlock has an attribute for each type of element. However, this does not scale well, does not adhere to good practices of object-oriented programming and it is not intuitive when generic statements are in the mix. For instance, let's imagine a conditional statement has a atomic unit in its blocks. Should the atomic unit also be added to the
atomic_units
attribute? It doesn't make sense.Describe alternatives you've considered
The UnitBlock should have a single attribute for statements.
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: