Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Does input FASTA file have to be aligned? #841

Open
laurien-0 opened this issue May 2, 2024 · 2 comments
Open

Does input FASTA file have to be aligned? #841

laurien-0 opened this issue May 2, 2024 · 2 comments

Comments

@laurien-0
Copy link

I have run just the following commands

mmseqs createdb x_protseqs.fasta x_db
mmseqs cluster x_db x_clust tmp --min-seq-id 0.9
mmseqs createtsv x_db x_db x_clust x_clust.tsv

My input x_protseqs.fasta is not aligned, and I got some slightly weird results from it
Namely that when I aligned all the cluster representatives with an online MSA tool and plotted the PIM, I got some 99%s in there.

Is this just a quirk of the different alignment algorithms or should I be pre-aligning my data?

Thank you

@milot-mirdita
Copy link
Member

The clustering does NOT take aligned input. Gaps would be turned to X characters and result in very odd alignments.

I am not sure I understand your issue with the weird alignments.

@laurien-0
Copy link
Author

Thank you, that is useful to know.
IE I clustered at 70% and at 90% but with both - when I downloaded the representative sequences from each cluster and ran these in a MSA tool you would expect to see maximum roughly 70% and 90% pairwise comparisons right? The PIM is the percentage identity matrix. Instead I got values of up to 99% in both.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants