You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
My input x_protseqs.fasta is not aligned, and I got some slightly weird results from it
Namely that when I aligned all the cluster representatives with an online MSA tool and plotted the PIM, I got some 99%s in there.
Is this just a quirk of the different alignment algorithms or should I be pre-aligning my data?
Thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered:
Thank you, that is useful to know.
IE I clustered at 70% and at 90% but with both - when I downloaded the representative sequences from each cluster and ran these in a MSA tool you would expect to see maximum roughly 70% and 90% pairwise comparisons right? The PIM is the percentage identity matrix. Instead I got values of up to 99% in both.
I have run just the following commands
mmseqs createdb x_protseqs.fasta x_db
mmseqs cluster x_db x_clust tmp --min-seq-id 0.9
mmseqs createtsv x_db x_db x_clust x_clust.tsv
My input x_protseqs.fasta is not aligned, and I got some slightly weird results from it
Namely that when I aligned all the cluster representatives with an online MSA tool and plotted the PIM, I got some 99%s in there.
Is this just a quirk of the different alignment algorithms or should I be pre-aligning my data?
Thank you
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: