You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
{{ message }}
This repository has been archived by the owner on Feb 28, 2024. It is now read-only.
I was testing the different samplers when I realised that for each variable in my space, whatever its type, and whatever the number of samples requested, the first and last values (in order) of each variable are 2 times less chosen than the others if it's a Sobol or Latin Hypercube sampler. This problem does not exist if we use uniform sampling.
I've looked in Issues, on the Internet and in the scikit-optimize source code for an answer but I haven't been able to find one. Do you have an answer?
Hi,
I was testing the different samplers when I realised that for each variable in my space, whatever its type, and whatever the number of samples requested, the first and last values (in order) of each variable are 2 times less chosen than the others if it's a Sobol or Latin Hypercube sampler. This problem does not exist if we use uniform sampling.
I've looked in Issues, on the Internet and in the scikit-optimize source code for an answer but I haven't been able to find one. Do you have an answer?
Here is the code that reproduces the problem:
Thanks for your help,
Jordan
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: