apply adaptation on Selectable with Fields (#20489)"}},{"before":"6e86ada28c0df04642b76104ea66b783a3d8d0c4","after":"110600b533d411bc65c9a01c700d1290d66d7a08","ref":"refs/heads/main","pushedAt":"2024-05-29T15:03:07.000Z","pushType":"pr_merge","commitsCount":2,"pusher":{"login":"sjrd","name":"Sébastien Doeraene","path":"/sjrd","primaryAvatarUrl":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/535934?s=80&v=4"},"commit":{"message":"tryCompiletimeConstantFold in disjointnessBoundary (#20168)\n\nFixes #20166\r\n\r\nAlternatively placing the tryCompiletimeConstantFold in\r\n`AppliedType#superType` also seems to fix the issue and not break\r\nanything. But I'm not very sure about the spec here either way.","shortMessageHtmlLink":"tryCompiletimeConstantFold in disjointnessBoundary (#20168)"}},{"before":"d1b51dc0a677960aeb804d449cd0adf980fb812e","after":"6e86ada28c0df04642b76104ea66b783a3d8d0c4","ref":"refs/heads/main","pushedAt":"2024-05-28T23:12:40.000Z","pushType":"pr_merge","commitsCount":6,"pusher":{"login":"hamzaremmal","name":"Hamza Remmal","path":"/hamzaremmal","primaryAvatarUrl":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/56235032?s=80&v=4"},"commit":{"message":"Priority warning fix alternative (#20487)\n\nWarn about priority change in implicit search only if one of the\r\nparticipating candidates appears in the final result.\r\n\r\nIt could be that we have an priority change between two ranked\r\ncandidates that both are superseded by the result of the implicit\r\nsearch. In this case, no warning needs to be reported.\r\n\r\nThis PR is #20480 with different code for the last commit. I tried to\r\navoid entangling the priority handling too much in the returns types and\r\nspent a side effect instead. I believe it's more efficient that way,\r\nsince priority warnings are very rare.\r\n\r\nFixes #20484","shortMessageHtmlLink":"Priority warning fix alternative (#20487)"}},{"before":"a21d2af0c512f57cc0998e93309e33df8b34d71f","after":"d1b51dc0a677960aeb804d449cd0adf980fb812e","ref":"refs/heads/main","pushedAt":"2024-05-28T20:20:36.000Z","pushType":"pr_merge","commitsCount":5,"pusher":{"login":"odersky","name":null,"path":"/odersky","primaryAvatarUrl":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/795990?s=80&v=4"},"commit":{"message":"Explain unresolvable references better (#20477)\n\nWe run into problems when referring to a member of a self type of a\r\nclass that it not also a member of the class from outside via an\r\nasSeenFrom.\r\n\r\nOne example is in 11226.scala where we see:\r\n```scala\r\ntrait ManagedActorClassification { this: ActorEventBus =>\r\n def unsubscribe(subscriber: Subscriber): Unit\r\n}\r\n\r\nclass Unsubscriber(bus: ManagedActorClassification) {\r\n def test(a: ActorRef): Unit = bus.unsubscribe(a) // error\r\n}\r\n```\r\nThe problem is that `unsubscribe` refers to the type `Subscriber` which\r\nis not resolvable as a member of `bus`. one idea could be to rule out\r\ntype signatures like `unsubscribe`, similar how we rule out public\r\nsignatures referring to private members. But this could rule out\r\nexisting valid programs. For instance, the `unsubscribe` signature is\r\nunproblematic if it gets only called with prefixes that inherit\r\n`ActorEventBus`. You could say that the problem was instead that the\r\ntype of `bus` was not specific enough.\r\n\r\nIn the long term, maybe restricting the signature is the right move. But\r\nfor now, we just try to give better error messages in the case of\r\nexisting failures.\r\n\r\nFixes #11226","shortMessageHtmlLink":"Explain unresolvable references better (#20477)"}},{"before":"3fdb2923f83acd2ef8910c9f71a394c46be4e268","after":"a21d2af0c512f57cc0998e93309e33df8b34d71f","ref":"refs/heads/main","pushedAt":"2024-05-28T18:53:14.000Z","pushType":"pr_merge","commitsCount":2,"pusher":{"login":"noti0na1","name":"noti0na1","path":"/noti0na1","primaryAvatarUrl":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/8036790?s=80&v=4"},"commit":{"message":"Fix isEffectivelySingleton (#20486)\n\nAs usual, OrTypes need to be excluded. a.type | b.type is not\r\neffectively a singleton. It seems to be an easy trap to fall into.\r\n\r\nFollow-up to #20474","shortMessageHtmlLink":"Fix isEffectivelySingleton (#20486)"}},{"before":"9b5ab2e37a544b522e307ff5883a40d85057fe2e","after":"3fdb2923f83acd2ef8910c9f71a394c46be4e268","ref":"refs/heads/main","pushedAt":"2024-05-28T14:54:15.000Z","pushType":"pr_merge","commitsCount":1,"pusher":{"login":"rochala","name":"Jędrzej Rochala","path":"/rochala","primaryAvatarUrl":"https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/u/48657087?s=80&v=4"},"commit":{"message":"Add error code to diagnostics about unused code (#19780)\n\nCo-authored-by: ghostbuster91 Sourced from