Strange formatting of macro_rules! macro

[Andlon]

With Rust 1.77.1 and rustfmt 1.7.0, as well as on current nightly 2024-03-30, the following macro definition (playground)

macro_rules! assert_eq_and_type {
    ($left:expr, $right:expr $(,)?) => {
        {
            fn check_statically_same_type<T>(_: &T, _: &T) {}
            check_statically_same_type(&$left, &$right);
        }
        assert_eq!($left, $right);
    };
}

formats to

macro_rules! assert_eq_and_type {
    ($left:expr, $right:expr $(,)?) => {{
        fn check_statically_same_type<T>(_: &T, _: &T) {}
        check_statically_same_type(&$left, &$right);
    }
    assert_eq!($left, $right);};
}

This certainly doesn't look right to me. I looked at other reported macro-related issues but couldn't find any very similar issues.

[ytmimi]

@Andlon thanks for the report. This definitely feels like a distinct formatting issue. When you get a chance can you run rustfmt +1.77.1 --version and rustfmt +nightly --version so we get exact version numbers. Also, are you using a configuration options?

[Andlon]

@ytmimi: The command rustfmt +1.77.1 --version does not work for me, complaining that error: toolchain '1.77.1-x86_64-unknown-linux-gnu' is not installed (though rustc is definitely 1.77.1).

In any case, the issue can be reproduced on the playground (see my link in the first issue). There it says that for:

• for stable 1.77.1, it's using rustfmt 1.7.0-stable (2024-03-27 7cf61eb).
• for 1.79.0-nightly (2024-03-31 805813650248c1a2f6f2) it's using rustfmt 1.7.0-nightly (2024-03-31 8058136).

I hope that helps!

[Andlon]

As for configuration options, I assume the playground uses default options? The code base I was working on locally had a rustfmt.toml like this:

edition = "2018"
use_try_shorthand = true
use_field_init_shorthand = true

[ytmimi]

Thanks for the extra info! I'm also guessing that the playground uses default options, and I think it's unlikely that the configuration options you're currently using lead to this issue.

[ytmimi]

@correabuscar my guess is that this is unrelated. rustfmt doesn't format macros that use repetition so that likely explains why your manual edits are left unchanged.