Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Website Squatted #49

Open
destructobeam opened this issue Feb 25, 2023 · 16 comments
Open

Website Squatted #49

destructobeam opened this issue Feb 25, 2023 · 16 comments

Comments

@destructobeam
Copy link

It looks like the registration for the website you have listed for the project expired and has been taken over.

@destructobeam
Copy link
Author

Just realised I already made an issue for this on the website repo. Apologies.

@adamluzsi
Copy link
Member

No worries. I primarily watch this project for issues, so you posted this in the perfect place. 👍

@adamluzsi adamluzsi reopened this Feb 28, 2023
@adamluzsi
Copy link
Member

Oh, Heroku free tier is over... 🙈

@adamluzsi
Copy link
Member

adamluzsi commented Feb 28, 2023

Do you have any suggestions on where I should move the content @destructobeam?
Perhaps converting everything into Markdown and moving it under the GH wiki page?

@destructobeam
Copy link
Author

You can use GitHub pages with Jekyll. That might be easiest as that’s also Ruby?

@adamluzsi
Copy link
Member

I will look into that; thank you for the great tip!

@waghanza
Copy link
Contributor

or use fly.io @adamluzsi (and maybe ping me we http://www.rack-app.com/ will be up)

@adamluzsi
Copy link
Member

adamluzsi commented May 11, 2023

Hey there, @waghanza and @destructobeam!

I had a chance to check out fly.io, and it seems like a great platform!
But here's the thing: it might be too much for our needs when I think about it.
Our primary focus is organizing examples for the framework, and since my website mainly consists of Gists from GitHub, it seems more practical to stick with GitHub only.
Writing a wiki might take a bit longer, but it'll be easier for most users to access the examples in the long run.

Work has been keeping me busy lately, so I could not start rewriting the documentation as a wiki.
But I'm excited to dive in, and I appreciate your understanding!
Feel free to let me know if you have any further thoughts or suggestions.
In the meantime, if you need the website today, please try this:

git clone git@github.com:rack-app/website.git rack-app-website
cd rack-app-website
bundle 
bundle exec rackup

@waghanza
Copy link
Contributor

I understand that https://fly.io/ could be more than needed, but probably then https://readthedocs.org/ could be cool too

I'm not keen on letting user build the doc himself/herself.

PS : And also benchmarking section with ruby 2.3.0p0 is a, imho, not a great promotion made for rack-app. I'll plan to make a graphql endpoint for my benchmarking project if you want

@adamluzsi
Copy link
Member

Hey, there @waghanza,

When my daughter was born, everything shifted for me, and naturally, family and essentials took precedence over projects like rack-app. That said, I'm quite proud of how well rack-app has been designed. It's held up without any significant issues (barring the website hiccup), so upkeep has been manageable. I recognise that lately, it might seem like the project has taken a backseat. Most of my energy went into the essentials: maintenance and responding to support queries. The extras, well, they sort of got moved to the back burner.

On the brighter side, a recent change in my employment situation has given me some unexpected free time. Once I've secured a new role, I hope to use this extra time to revisit some long-standing plans with rack-app, including refreshing the documentation, updating the benchmark, and improving the startup time.

@waghanza
Copy link
Contributor

Congrats for your parenthood @adamluzsi 🎉

@destructobeam
Copy link
Author

destructobeam commented Aug 29, 2023

@adamluzsi Congrats! Hosting aside, the domain name has been grabbed by someone else. So might be worth just removing the link to the squatted site in the description until a new site/domain is up?

@adamluzsi
Copy link
Member

Good point. I do some late night work today and create a wiki and remove the domain link.

@adamluzsi
Copy link
Member

adamluzsi commented Sep 1, 2023

Hello @destructobeam, I made a wiki page today, can you give a quick look if it would be a sufficient replacement for the website?

https://github.com/rack-app/rack-app/wiki

@destructobeam
Copy link
Author

@adamluzsi Sorry for the very late reply. It looks good, there are just some references to the original website in the READEME that need updating to point to the wiki. Don't know if I'll get any time, but if I do I will create a pull request. Should be a quick find and replace.

Thanks!

@adamluzsi
Copy link
Member

It would be an honour if you would lend your name to the project with your contribution!
Then I don't even try to find them. :D
Many thanks for helping out, Simon (@destructobeam)!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants