Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Comments included in values #55

Open
jefferyto opened this issue Aug 7, 2023 · 7 comments
Open

Comments included in values #55

jefferyto opened this issue Aug 7, 2023 · 7 comments
Labels

Comments

@jefferyto
Copy link

I'm looking into updating the OpenWrt package for iniconfig (from 1.1.1 to 2.0.0), and when I try the example from the readme with 2.0.0 (using the example ini file) I get:

Python 3.11.4 (main, Aug  3 2023, 22:34:22) [GCC 12.3.0] on linux
Type "help", "copyright", "credits" or "license" for more information.
>>> import iniconfig
>>> ini = iniconfig.IniConfig("example.ini")
>>> ini['section1']['name1']
'value1  # comment'
>>> ini.get('section1', 'name1b', [], lambda x: x.split(","))
['value1', 'value2  # comment']
>>> ini.get('section1', 'notexist', [], lambda x: x.split(","))
[]
>>> [x.name for x in list(ini)]
['section1', 'section2']
>>> list(list(ini)[0].items())
[('name1', 'value1  # comment'), ('name1b', 'value1,value2  # comment')]
>>> 'section1' in ini
True
>>> 'inexistendsection' in ini
False
>>> 

Note that # comment is included with the value of name1 and the second value of name1b. This appears to differ from the output in the readme - is the above the expected/correct output?

@RonnyPfannschmidt
Copy link
Member

I won't be able to get into this today, does the behavior replicate on a desktop python?

@jefferyto
Copy link
Author

I won't be able to get into this today, does the behavior replicate on a desktop python?

Yes, I get the same results in a venv on Ubuntu 23.04 (Python 3.11.4).

@RonnyPfannschmidt
Copy link
Member

wow, seems like this is a allwinner, the bug got pulled in from the pylib codebase in 3ebb68c in 2016 by me

now i gotta figure how that was added/missed in pylib as well
this might end up being a 10 year missed bug

@RonnyPfannschmidt
Copy link
Member

introduced in pytest-dev/py@ba38736 it seems

@RonnyPfannschmidt
Copy link
Member

as far as i can tell it seems necessary to elevate this bug to a default feature and allow a "opt out" 😱

@RonnyPfannschmidt
Copy link
Member

@jefferyto as far as i can tell now after research, the behavior you observe is indeed intended, but its introduction was a bit roundabout, a design decission is needed on how to change it now

@jefferyto
Copy link
Author

Thanks for investigating - I'm not really a user of this module so I'm okay with whatever resolution is deemed appropriate.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants