Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

Sign up for GitHub

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Jump to bottom

More flexible predefined facilities #385

Open
jGaboardi opened this issue Jun 19, 2023 · 0 comments
Open

More flexible predefined facilities #385

jGaboardi opened this issue Jun 19, 2023 · 0 comments
Assignees
@ljwolf @jGaboardi @gegen07
Labels
enhancement New feature or request locate

Comments

@jGaboardi
Copy link
Member

As demonstrated in #352 and resolved in #384, the strict binary implementation of predefined facilities needed clearer explanation. To further the ease of use, we should consider adding functionality for predefining facilities by name or label, or possibly even based on condition (though that would take some more work).
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Assignees

@ljwolf ljwolf

@jGaboardi jGaboardi

@gegen07 gegen07

Labels
enhancement New feature or request locate
Projects
None yet
Milestone
No milestone
Development

No branches or pull requests
3 participants
@ljwolf @jGaboardi @gegen07