You signed in with another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You signed out in another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.You switched accounts on another tab or window. Reload to refresh your session.Dismiss alert
For some reason, using subprocess.run() inside of a side_effect function doesn't seem to work. Take the following, which demonstrates the expected behavior:
When the same subprocess.run(["which", "free"]) call is made from inside a side_effect function, the free command is somehow executed instead of which free!
The output of thefuck --version (something like The Fuck 3.1 using Python 3.5.0 and Bash 4.4.12(1)-release):
The Fuck 3.32 using Python 3.11.4 and Bash 5.2.15(1)-release
Your system (Debian 7, ArchLinux, Windows, etc.):
Ubuntu 23.04
How to reproduce the bug:
Create ~/.config/thefuck/rules/subprocess_test.py, which is a very simple rule which basically tries to run which free as a side effect:
For some reason, using
subprocess.run()
inside of aside_effect
function doesn't seem to work. Take the following, which demonstrates the expected behavior:When the same
subprocess.run(["which", "free"])
call is made from inside aside_effect
function, thefree
command is somehow executed instead ofwhich free
!The output of
thefuck --version
(something likeThe Fuck 3.1 using Python 3.5.0 and Bash 4.4.12(1)-release
):Your system (Debian 7, ArchLinux, Windows, etc.):
How to reproduce the bug:
Create
~/.config/thefuck/rules/subprocess_test.py
, which is a very simple rule which basically tries to runwhich free
as a side effect:Reload
thefuck
(open a new shell) and runfuck
until the rule is tried and applied. You get the (erroneous) output seen below.The output of The Fuck with
THEFUCK_DEBUG=true
exported (typically executeexport THEFUCK_DEBUG=true
in your shell before The Fuck):If the bug only appears with a specific application, the output of that application and its version:
N/A
Anything else you think is relevant:
N/A
The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: