Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Private Messages #157

Open
cryptogun opened this issue Jan 18, 2017 · 7 comments
Open

Private Messages #157

cryptogun opened this issue Jan 18, 2017 · 7 comments

Comments

@cryptogun
Copy link
Contributor

Private message should be differ from private topic. In a private conversation, you should ask for the opposite sides for permission before allowing a new person to join the conversation. Or just disable the invite function for private message.

@nitely nitely changed the title Private message is not private Private Topics Jan 18, 2017
@nitely nitely changed the title Private Topics Private Messages Jan 18, 2017
@nitely
Copy link
Owner

nitely commented Jan 18, 2017

Private topics are private. The owners of a private topic can invite whoever they want. That's how it works and it's the intended behaviour.

In a private conversation, you should ask for the opposite sides for permission before allowing a new person to join the conversation.

That sounds like a different feature. For example private groups, where a member ask to join in, then they are allowed to view all topics created by that group.

Or just disable the invite function for private message.

What would be the purpose of this? Nothing is really private if everyone involve don't want to keep it private (i.e they can take screen-shots of conversations and so on). Disabling the invite function would be crippling the private topics feature for no good reason, IMHO.

@cryptogun
Copy link
Contributor Author

Yes, the feature of private topic is great. But many user may think private message is like SMS and meant to be more private then private topic. e.g. a man send a private message(love letter/booty call etc.) to a woman, then she invites many user into this private message, that would be embarrassing.

@nitely
Copy link
Owner

nitely commented Jan 18, 2017

What keeps the woman from taking a screen-shot and sharing it?

@cryptogun
Copy link
Contributor Author

He can lie 😺
Neither can SMS. He should bear it. But SMS is a bit better then private topic. If he needs the invitation feature, he can use private topic. If he needs the SMS feature, we should provide the improved private message functionality.

@nitely
Copy link
Owner

nitely commented Jan 18, 2017

Well, yeah haha. I guess we could disable the private topic invites and add a "Private Group Topic" where the invites are enabled. But I'm still not convinced about it.

@alesdotio
Copy link
Contributor

I think the current implementation is fine. The only thing I changed on my forum is I separated topic notifications and private message notifications.

@cryptogun
Copy link
Contributor Author

I just finish copying private folder to SMS folder and modifying SMS for private messages today. I made lots of modifications and now it works. I'll post my site link here once it's finished and up in case someone wanna see the final result. And I'll make some part of it opensource once I'm free.
As for PM/SMS, Here are some of the features/modifications:

  • SMSs are all in the same topic (that has and only has two of the participants). No need to open new topic hence a better communication and a better/clean layout.
  • Disable join and leave functions in a SMS topic so that it works like a SMS service. Author of a SMS topic can't kick the recipient out otherwise the recipient can't access the SMS history. User can "Unnotify" or "flag" in case spamming happens.

Con: Since user can modify their comments, that means they can modify the SMS they've sent to your phone. Analogy.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

3 participants