Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Support missing regressors in FirstlevelGLM #2401

Open
bthirion opened this issue Aug 25, 2019 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #4076
Open

Support missing regressors in FirstlevelGLM #2401

bthirion opened this issue Aug 25, 2019 · 0 comments · May be fixed by #4076
Assignees
Labels
Enhancement for feature requests GLM Issues/PRs related to the nilearn.glm module.

Comments

@bthirion
Copy link
Member

Currently, the occurrence of different sets of trial types across sessions in a FirstLevelGLM raises an error, because the model expects the conditions to be identical in all sessions.
This is an issue with randomized designs, where one of the conditions is absent.

Alternatively ---or as a first step ?--- Nistats should provide an example where this is handled with a separate fit of the different sessions and then an explicit fixed effects analysis.

@kchawla-pi kchawla-pi transferred this issue from nilearn/nistats Apr 2, 2020
@kchawla-pi kchawla-pi added the GLM Issues/PRs related to the nilearn.glm module. label Apr 2, 2020
@tsalo tsalo added the Enhancement for feature requests label Mar 25, 2022
@Remi-Gau Remi-Gau added this to the release 0.11.0 milestone Oct 7, 2023
@Remi-Gau Remi-Gau self-assigned this Oct 19, 2023
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Enhancement for feature requests GLM Issues/PRs related to the nilearn.glm module.
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging a pull request may close this issue.

4 participants