Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Tracking issue for future wishlist - good ideas - maybes (?) #7099

Open
2 tasks
MridulS opened this issue Nov 8, 2023 · 1 comment
Open
2 tasks

Tracking issue for future wishlist - good ideas - maybes (?) #7099

MridulS opened this issue Nov 8, 2023 · 1 comment
Labels
Discussion Issues for discussion and decision making

Comments

@MridulS
Copy link
Member

MridulS commented Nov 8, 2023

@networkx/core-developers feel free to add more things to the list below.


We have had a bunch of great ideas over the last ~20 years from a lot of networkx contributors! A bunch of those PRs unfortunately are too out of date and gone stale due to limited reviewer bandwidth. This is an evolving tracking issue just to keep some of these things noted down here. If these ideas do become flushed out, let's move it to the roadmap. If the change requires much more discussion we should open a NXEP. Let's only move to implementation once we know that it would be reviewed :)

New base classes:

I/O formats:

@MridulS MridulS added the Discussion Issues for discussion and decision making label Nov 8, 2023
@Peiffap
Copy link

Peiffap commented Jun 6, 2024

@MridulS Perhaps we can add knotty centrality (#10 and more recently #6475) as a new algorithm worth implementing.

Having the naive implementation you mention in #10 and some tests to compare against it would likely make it easier for people to work on this should they wish to do so.

It would also be nice to push your fix the recursion error to main...MridulS:networkx:knotty_cent_review, together with any additional changes you might have made in the meantime.

Also pinging @ManasviEmmadi and @swederik, since they worked on this and might have additional context, and @boothby who put some effort into reviewing.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Discussion Issues for discussion and decision making
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants