Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Missing link Lesson 2 Module 3 Benefits to you #650

Open
rebeccaringuette opened this issue Feb 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Open

Missing link Lesson 2 Module 3 Benefits to you #650

rebeccaringuette opened this issue Feb 5, 2024 · 1 comment
Labels
Lesson: 2 Module: 3 OS101 Curriculum: Content Suggestions Suggestions for text found in the open science 101 curriculum. Use Lesson and Module labels. OS101 Status: Curriculum Openscience101.org still needs changes implemented. OS101 Status: GitHub GitHub still needs changes implemented.

Comments

@rebeccaringuette
Copy link

rebeccaringuette commented Feb 5, 2024

In the 'Benefits to You' section, the link in the following text is missing.
Articles that make their data openly accessible via a direct link to a repository see ~25% higher citation impact, according to a 2020 study.
The link should be to this paper.
Citation: Colavizza G, Hrynaszkiewicz I, Staden I,
Whitaker K, McGillivray B (2020) The citation
advantage of linking publications to research data.
PLoS ONE 15(4): e0230416. https://doi.org/
10.1371/journal.pone.0230416

The text in the previous paragraph in the material has the link to the paper above:
"Publishing open access increases citation count by 18%, according to a 2018 study(opens in a new tab)."

The 2018 study obviously was not published in 2020. The study could be the one below, especially since is has the 18% increase comment in the abstract. However, the study was quite limited, and there may be better choices.

  • Piwowar H, Priem J, Larivière V, Alperin JP, Matthias L, Norlander B, Farley A, West J, Haustein S. 2018. The state of OA: a large-scale analysis of the prevalence and impact of Open Access articles. PeerJ 6:e4375 https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4375
@bressler95tops
Copy link
Contributor

thank you @rebeccaringuette feel free to let us know if you find anything else!

For future reference, we just recently released OS101 for citations and this has caused a few things to change here on GitHub with the development version of the curriculum. We now have new guidance that is located here and will be reviewing all the great feedback we received over the next few weeks as we determine standard processes.

You can keep making suggestions the way you have been, but the biggest change right now is that we have relocated the files for the development version here to facilitate the process. The location at openscience.org will of course be the same to get badged.

Thank you and let me know if you have any questions.

@bressler95tops bressler95tops added OS101 Curriculum: Content Suggestions Suggestions for text found in the open science 101 curriculum. Use Lesson and Module labels. Module: 3 Lesson: 2 OS101 Status: Curriculum Openscience101.org still needs changes implemented. OS101 Status: GitHub GitHub still needs changes implemented. labels Feb 7, 2024
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
Lesson: 2 Module: 3 OS101 Curriculum: Content Suggestions Suggestions for text found in the open science 101 curriculum. Use Lesson and Module labels. OS101 Status: Curriculum Openscience101.org still needs changes implemented. OS101 Status: GitHub GitHub still needs changes implemented.
Projects
None yet
Development

No branches or pull requests

2 participants