Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Allow multiple categories for a feed #2575

Open
1 task done
lloydjatkinson opened this issue Mar 29, 2024 · 5 comments
Open
1 task done

Allow multiple categories for a feed #2575

lloydjatkinson opened this issue Mar 29, 2024 · 5 comments

Comments

@lloydjatkinson
Copy link

lloydjatkinson commented Mar 29, 2024

Improving existing features is more important than adding new ones.

I believe this feature meets this requirement.


Hi,

I would like to be able to add multiple categories to a feed. Several feeds I subscribe to have overlapping categories, and it's awkward putting a feed under one category when really it fits two or more. So what I end up doing is either have everything under the existing "All" category, or have super vague and generic categories which somewhat defeats the purpose.

This is where I am drawing inspiration from:

image

What are your thoughts on this? 😄

@Sleepful
Copy link

Hi,

I submitted an issue here with this idea too.

I proposed 3 different ways of implementation for the UX, the #2 fits your issue!

Check here:

#2573

I would be happy to implement any of the three options.

@Sleepful
Copy link

Waiting for feedback from @rdelaage tho

@rdelaage
Copy link
Contributor

Don't know why you wait for my feedback :). Personally I thing it is ok, people that do not want multiple categories can just use one category. Reading the miniflux website I found that https://miniflux.app/docs/migration.html. It was possible to use multiple categories for a feed in Miniflux v1 but this was removed in v2 by the author. The author doesn't want a feature that goes against the philosophy of the software (minimalism) so don't know if this is a wanted feature (there is no formal definition of the minimalism).

@Sleepful
Copy link

Sleepful commented Mar 31, 2024

oh sorry @rdelaage , i meant to tag @fguillot , whom I assume is the main maintainer. I must have confused you because of the profile picture. oops :)

Like you said though:

The author doesn't want a feature that goes against the philosophy of the software (minimalism) so don't know if this is a wanted feature (there is no formal definition of the minimalism).

This is why I want to hear approval before submitting a PR.

@fguillot
Copy link
Member

fguillot commented Apr 4, 2024

This feature has been requested several times in the past if you search through this issue tracker.

I'm not against this feature, but I am concerned about the number of changes required to implement it properly.

Not only does the database schema have to be modified, but it also impacts different parts of the application, such as the Miniflux API, the Fever API, the web UI, etc.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Development

No branches or pull requests

4 participants